IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0304501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of caregiving on the roles and valued activities of stroke carers: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa Jammal
  • Gregory S Kolt
  • Karen P Y Liu
  • Nariman Dennaoui
  • Emma S George

Abstract

Objective: To understand the experiences of informal carers and the impact of role and activity changes on their health and wellbeing. Methods: A systematic search of CINHAL, MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science was conducted. Studies were eligible if they included informal stroke carers (≥18 years), used a qualitative methodology, explored the roles and valued activities of stroke carers, and were published in English. The 10-item Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative studies was used to assess methodological quality. The results of the included studies were thematically synthesised. Results: A total of 36 qualitative studies were included and four overarching themes were identified: (1) Life adjustment; (2) Changing role and identity; (3) Changing activities: From meaningful to purposeful; and (4) Understanding and supporting carers. Conclusion: The sudden nature of stroke requires major readjustment in the carers life that has implications on their relationships, roles, and activities, subsequently impacting on their health and wellbeing. Health professionals and researchers should collaborate with stroke carers to identify their valued activities and implement realistic strategies to maintain these activities. Future interventions designed for carers should implement education about the importance of participating in valued activities and strategies to maintain these activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa Jammal & Gregory S Kolt & Karen P Y Liu & Nariman Dennaoui & Emma S George, 2024. "The impact of caregiving on the roles and valued activities of stroke carers: A systematic review of qualitative studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304501
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304501
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304501&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0304501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.