IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0304423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential of the transformer-based survival analysis model, SurvTrace, for predicting recurrent cardiovascular events and stratifying high-risk patients with ischemic heart disease

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroki Shinohara
  • Satoshi Kodera
  • Yugo Nagae
  • Takashi Hiruma
  • Atsushi Kobayashi
  • Masataka Sato
  • Shinnosuke Sawano
  • Tatsuya Kamon
  • Koichi Narita
  • Kazutoshi Hirose
  • Hiroyuki Kiriyama
  • Akihito Saito
  • Mizuki Miura
  • Shun Minatsuki
  • Hironobu Kikuchi
  • Norifumi Takeda
  • Hiroshi Akazawa
  • Hiroyuki Morita
  • Issei Komuro

Abstract

Introduction: Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide, and its importance is increasing with the aging population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of SurvTrace, a survival analysis model using the Transformer—a state-of-the-art deep learning method—for predicting recurrent cardiovascular events and stratifying high-risk patients. The model’s performance was compared to that of a conventional scoring system utilizing real-world data from cardiovascular patients. Methods: This study consecutively enrolled patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Tokyo Hospital, between 2005 and 2019. Each patient’s initial PCI at our hospital was designated as the index procedure, and a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was monitored for up to two years post-index event. Data regarding patient background, clinical presentation, medical history, medications, and perioperative complications were collected to predict MACE. The performance of two models—a conventional scoring system proposed by Wilson et al. and the Transformer-based model SurvTrace—was evaluated using Harrell’s c-index, Kaplan–Meier curves, and log-rank tests. Results: A total of 3938 cases were included in the study, with 394 used as the test dataset and the remaining 3544 used for model training. SurvTrace exhibited a mean c-index of 0.72 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.69–0.76), which indicated higher prognostic accuracy compared with the conventional scoring system’s 0.64 (95% CI: 0.64–0.64). Moreover, SurvTrace demonstrated superior risk stratification ability, effectively distinguishing between the high-risk group and other risk categories in terms of event occurrence. In contrast, the conventional system only showed a significant difference between the low-risk and high-risk groups. Conclusion: This study based on real-world cardiovascular patient data underscores the potential of the Transformer-based survival analysis model, SurvTrace, for predicting recurrent cardiovascular events and stratifying high-risk patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroki Shinohara & Satoshi Kodera & Yugo Nagae & Takashi Hiruma & Atsushi Kobayashi & Masataka Sato & Shinnosuke Sawano & Tatsuya Kamon & Koichi Narita & Kazutoshi Hirose & Hiroyuki Kiriyama & Akihito, 2024. "The potential of the transformer-based survival analysis model, SurvTrace, for predicting recurrent cardiovascular events and stratifying high-risk patients with ischemic heart disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304423
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304423&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0304423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.