Author
Listed:
- Jinfeng Luo
- Yuling Xing
- Fangzhou Li
Abstract
Background: Previous observational studies have shown controversial results about the relationship between lipid levels and low back pain (LBP). Herein, we aimed to explore the potential causal relationship between lipid levels and LBP by using the mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: In this two-sample MR study, data were extracted from publicly available MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit database. Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of lipid levels [high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides (TG)] and two SNPs of LBP risk (LBP and back pain) were retrieved and used as genetic instrumental variables. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger, robust adjusted profile score (MR-RAPS), and MR-PRESSO were used to examine the potential causal association between lipid levels and LBP. Results: IVW (fixed effect) estimation indicated that increased HDL-C level was negatively related to the odds of LBP for European populations. [odds ratio (OR) = 0.923, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.857–0.993, P = 0.0323]. Similar results were also found in IVW (random effect) (OR = 0.923, 95% CI: 0.866–0.983, P = 0.0134), MR-Egger (OR = 0.858, 95%CI: 0.757–0.973, P = 0.0177), MR-RAPS (OR = 0.932, 95%CI: 0.871–0.997, P = 0.0419), and MR-PRESSO (OR = 0.933, 95%CI: 0.880–0.989, P = 0.0198) analyses. Whereas no causal link was observed between LDL-C/TG and LBP risk (P>0.05). Conclusion: This two-sample MR study demonstrated a causal relationship between lipid levels and LBP risk. Further investigations are necessary to elucidate the causal association and specific underlying mechanisms by which lipid levels contribute to the development of LBP.
Suggested Citation
Jinfeng Luo & Yuling Xing & Fangzhou Li, 2024.
"Lipid levels and low back pain risk: A two-sample mendelian randomization study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-10, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0304280
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304280
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.