IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0304044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The association between Toxoplasma gondii infection and asthma in the United States: A cross-sectional survey analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Heather Anholt

Abstract

The hygiene hypothesis proposes that declining exposure to microbial influences early in life is implicated in the rising trend of allergy and asthma in high-income societies. Approximately 8% of Americans have been diagnosed with asthma, representing 25 million people, and understanding how the human microbiome affects asthma could help guide exposure recommendations or microbe-based therapeutics. Toxoplasma gondii is a common gastro-intestinal microorganism that may modulate immune function. We used a cross-sectional study design to examine a public database of U.S. residents aged 6–80 years or older from the 2012–2014 survey cycles of the American National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to construct an ordinal logistic regression model of the relationship between T. gondii infection and asthma. Of the 12,620 subjects tested for T. gondii infection, 89.2% were seronegative and 10.8% seropositive. No asthma was reported by 83.5% of subjects, while 16.5% reported varying degrees of asthma severity. We detected no significant association between T. gondii infection and asthma. While the unadjusted regression model suggested a small protective effect of T. gondii on asthma (OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.83–0.97), no effect was detected when the model was adjusted for key demographic factors (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.91–1.10). While T. gondii may be a marker for the protective effect of exposure to a diversity of microbial organisms early in life, it has no apparent causal effect on asthma, or it may not be significant when considered in isolation.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather Anholt, 2025. "The association between Toxoplasma gondii infection and asthma in the United States: A cross-sectional survey analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304044
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304044&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0304044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.