IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0303658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-rehabilitation strategy for rural community-dwelling stroke survivors in a lower-middle income country: a modified Delphi study

Author

Listed:
  • Rabiu Ibrahim
  • Conran Joseph
  • Aimée Stewart
  • Isa Usman Lawal

Abstract

Background: More than half of stroke survivors in lower-middle income countries lack access to stroke rehabilitation services. The promotion of self-rehabilitation could be promising for addressing stroke rehabilitation inadequacies in lower-middle income countries. Self-rehabilitation interventions are more readily acceptable to community-dwelling stroke survivors, and therefore, have the potential to boost the successful realization of the Sustainable Development Goals and other WHO rehabilitation goals. We report a consensus-building process that sought to identify which task trainings are relevant to include in a task-specific self-rehabilitation strategy for rural community-dwelling stroke survivors. Methods: An iterative two-stage mixed-method consensus-building approach was used: (1) focus group discussions (n = 5) with rural community-dwelling chronic stroke survivors were conducted to explore personal life experiences in performing daily activities, and the results were used to develop a list of candidate task trainings that could be included in a task-specific self-rehabilitation intervention model for improving functional ability of survivors; (2) a three-round Delphi exercise with a panel of stroke rehabilitation experts to establish consensus on the importance/relevance of the developed task trainings. Consensus was pre-defined to be the point where the proportion of items given a rating of 3 (quite relevant) or 4 (highly relevant) by expert panellists is ≥ 0.8. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) was used to assess the level of agreement among the expert panellists. Results: A list of 74 task trainings was generated from the results of the focus group discussions involving 29 chronic stroke survivors. The tasks were classified as follows: training for the upper extremity (37); lower extremity training (21); trunk training (7); and balance training (9). A panel of 13 stroke rehabilitation experts reviewed these task trainings using the Delphi method and consensus was reached on keeping 28 task trainings in the first round (Kendall’s W = 0.252, p

Suggested Citation

  • Rabiu Ibrahim & Conran Joseph & Aimée Stewart & Isa Usman Lawal, 2025. "Self-rehabilitation strategy for rural community-dwelling stroke survivors in a lower-middle income country: a modified Delphi study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303658
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303658
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303658&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0303658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.