IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0303332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CFDMI-SEC: An optimal model for copy-move forgery detection of medical image using SIFT, EOM and CHM

Author

Listed:
  • Ehsan Amiri
  • Ahmad Mosallanejad
  • Amir Sheikhahmadi

Abstract

Image forgery is one of the issues that can create challenges for law enforcement. Digital devices can easily Copy-move images, forging medical photos. In the insurance industry, forensics, and sports, image forgery has become very common and has created problems. Copy-Move Forgery in Medical Images (CMFMI) has led to abuses in areas where access to advanced medical devices is unavailable. The proposed model (SEC) is a three-part model based on an evolutionary algorithm that can detect fake blocks well. In the first part, suspicious points are discovered with the help of the SIFT algorithm. In the second part, suspicious blocks are found using the equilibrium optimization algorithm. Finally, color histogram Matching (CHM) matches questionable points and blocks. The proposed method (SEC) was evaluated based on accuracy, recall, and F1 criteria, and 100, 97.00, and 98.47% were obtained for the fake medical images, respectively. Experimental results show robustness against different transformation and post-processing operations on medical images.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehsan Amiri & Ahmad Mosallanejad & Amir Sheikhahmadi, 2024. "CFDMI-SEC: An optimal model for copy-move forgery detection of medical image using SIFT, EOM and CHM," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303332
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303332
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303332&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0303332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.