IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0303002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postoperative Karnofsky performance status prediction in patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma: A multimodal approach integrating clinical and deep imaging features

Author

Listed:
  • Tomoki Sasagasako
  • Akihiko Ueda
  • Yohei Mineharu
  • Yusuke Mochizuki
  • Souichiro Doi
  • Silsu Park
  • Yukinori Terada
  • Noritaka Sano
  • Masahiro Tanji
  • Yoshiki Arakawa
  • Yasushi Okuno

Abstract

Background and purpose: Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive brain tumor with limited survival that poses challenges in predicting patient outcomes. The Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score is a valuable tool for assessing patient functionality and contributes to the stratification of patients with poor prognoses. This study aimed to develop a 6-month postoperative KPS prediction model by combining clinical data with deep learning-based image features from pre- and postoperative MRI scans, offering enhanced personalized care for glioblastoma patients. Materials and methods: Using 1,476 MRI datasets from the Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2020 public database, we pretrained two variational autoencoders (VAEs). Imaging features from the latent spaces of the VAEs were used for KPS prediction. Neural network-based KPS prediction models were developed to predict scores below 70 at 6 months postoperatively. In this retrospective single-center analysis, we incorporated clinical parameters and pre- and postoperative MRI images from 150 newly diagnosed IDH wild-type glioblastoma, divided into training (100 patients) and test (50 patients) sets. In training set, the performance of these models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), calculated through fivefold cross-validation repeated 10 times. The final evaluation of the developed models assessed in the test set. Results: Among the 150 patients, 61 had 6-month postoperative KPS scores below 70 and 89 scored 70 or higher. We developed three models: a clinical-based model, an MRI-based model, and a multimodal model that incorporated both clinical parameters and MRI features. In the training set, the mean AUC was 0.785±0.051 for the multimodal model, which was significantly higher than the AUCs of the clinical-based model (0.716±0.059, P = 0.038) using only clinical parameters and the MRI-based model (0.651±0.028, P

Suggested Citation

  • Tomoki Sasagasako & Akihiko Ueda & Yohei Mineharu & Yusuke Mochizuki & Souichiro Doi & Silsu Park & Yukinori Terada & Noritaka Sano & Masahiro Tanji & Yoshiki Arakawa & Yasushi Okuno, 2024. "Postoperative Karnofsky performance status prediction in patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma: A multimodal approach integrating clinical and deep imaging features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303002
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0303002&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0303002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0303002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.