IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0302860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec for the treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Brígida Dias Fernandes
  • Bárbara Corrêa Krug
  • Fernanda D’Athayde Rodrigues
  • Hérica Núbia Cardoso Cirilo
  • Stéfani Sousa Borges
  • Ida Vanessa D Schwartz
  • Livia Fernandes Probst
  • Ivan Zimmermann

Abstract

Background: Onasemnogene abeparvovec has been approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy 5q type 1 in several countries, which calls for an independent assessment of the evidence regarding efficacy and safety. Objective: Conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec in patients diagnosed with SMA type 1, based on the available evidence. Methods: This article results from searches conducted on databases up to November 2022. Outcomes of interest were global survival and event-free survival, improvement in motor function and treatment-related adverse events. Risk of bias assessment and certainty of evidence were performed for each outcome. Proportional meta-analysis models were performed when applicable. Results: Four reports of three open-label, non-comparative clinical trials covering 67 patients were included. Meta-analyses of data available in a 12-month follow-up estimate a global survival of 97.56% (95%CI: 92.55 to 99.86, I2 = 0%, n = 67), an event-free survival of 96.5% (95%CI: 90.76 to 99.54, I2 = 32%, n = 66) and a CHOP-INTEND score ≥ 40 points proportion of 87.28% (95%CI: 69.81 to 97.83, I2 = 69%, n = 67). Proportion of 52.64% (95%CI: 27.11 to 77.45, I2 = 78%, n = 67) of treatment-related adverse events was estimated. Conclusion: The results indicate a potential change in the natural history of type 1 SMA, but the methodological limitations of the studies make the real extent of the technology’s long-term benefits uncertain.

Suggested Citation

  • Brígida Dias Fernandes & Bárbara Corrêa Krug & Fernanda D’Athayde Rodrigues & Hérica Núbia Cardoso Cirilo & Stéfani Sousa Borges & Ida Vanessa D Schwartz & Livia Fernandes Probst & Ivan Zimmermann, 2024. "Efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec for the treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: A systematic review with meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0302860
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302860
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302860&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0302860?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John W. Day & Jerry R. Mendell & Eugenio Mercuri & Richard S. Finkel & Kevin A. Strauss & Aaron Kleyn & Sitra Tauscher-Wisniewski & Francis Fonyuy Tukov & Sandra P. Reyna & Deepa H. Chand, 2021. "Clinical Trial and Postmarketing Safety of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Therapy," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(10), pages 1109-1119, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0302860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.