Author
Listed:
- Suenia Silva de Mesquita Xavier
- Lays Pinheiro de Medeiros
- Alcides Viana de Lima Neto
- Isabelle Pereira da Silva
- Silvia Kalyma Paiva Lucena
- Adriana Catarina de Souza Oliveira
- Rhayssa de Oliveira Araújo
- Isabelle Katherinne Fernandes Costa
Abstract
Introduction: The adaptation of people with ostomies may be associated with and affected by sociodemographic and clinical factors. The present study aimed to investigate the association between the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and the adaptation of people with an intestinal stoma. Method: An analytical study, carried out through an interview with 200 patients with ostomy for five months. For that, it was applied to scale for the level of adaptation of ostomy patients to measure the physiological domains, self-concept, role function and interdependence and a questionnaire was used in which sociodemographic and clinical information. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed to test the study hypothesis. Results: The study pointed out statistically significant associations with male sex, age group below 60, low education level, Stoma time less than one year, below one minimum wage, temporary permanence criteria and presence of complications relation to low scores of adaptation. Conclusions: The association of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the measured adaptive modes provides important information for the planning of nursing care and other care providers, since it directs actions to the aspects that give greater adaptive difficulty to people with stomas and which are the focus of care nursing to this clientele.
Suggested Citation
Suenia Silva de Mesquita Xavier & Lays Pinheiro de Medeiros & Alcides Viana de Lima Neto & Isabelle Pereira da Silva & Silvia Kalyma Paiva Lucena & Adriana Catarina de Souza Oliveira & Rhayssa de Oliv, 2024.
"Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of people with ostomy and the adaptive domains of Roy’s theory: A cross-sectional study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0302036
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302036
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0302036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.