IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0300851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interhospital variation in the nonoperative management of acute cholecystitis

Author

Listed:
  • Konmal Ali
  • Nikhil L Chervu
  • Sara Sakowitz
  • Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar
  • Peyman Benharash
  • Shahin Mohseni
  • Jessica A Keeley

Abstract

Background: Cholecystectomy remains the standard management for acute cholecystitis. Given that rates of nonoperative management have increased, we hypothesize the existence of significant hospital-level variability in operative rates. Thus, we characterized patients who were managed nonoperatively at normal and lower operative hospitals (>90th percentile). Methods: All adult admissions for acute cholecystitis were queried using the 2016–2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Centers were ranked by nonoperative rate using multi-level, mixed effects modeling. Hospitals in the top decile of nonoperative rate (>9.4%) were classified as Low Operative Hospitals (LOH; others:nLOH). Separate regression models were created to determine factors associated with nonoperative management at LOH and nLOH. Results: Of an estimated 418,545 patients, 9.9% were managed at 880 LOH. Multilevel modeling demonstrated that 20.6% of the variability was due to hospital factors alone. After adjustment, older age (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.02/year, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.01–1.02) and public insurance (Medicare AOR 1.31, CI 1.21–1.43 and Medicaid AOR 1.43, CI 1.31–1.57; reference: Private Insurance) were associated with nonoperative management at LOH. These were similar at nLOH. At LOH, SNH status (AOR 1.17, CI 1.07–1.28) and small institution size (AOR 1.20, CI 1.09–1.34) were associated with increased odds of nonoperative management. Conclusion: We noted a significant variability in the interhospital variation of the nonoperative management of acute cholecystitis. Nevertheless, comparable clinical and socioeconomic factors contribute to nonoperative management at both LOH and non-LOH. Directed strategies to address persistent non-clinical disparities are necessary to minimize deviation from standard protocol and ensure equitable care.

Suggested Citation

  • Konmal Ali & Nikhil L Chervu & Sara Sakowitz & Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar & Peyman Benharash & Shahin Mohseni & Jessica A Keeley, 2024. "Interhospital variation in the nonoperative management of acute cholecystitis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300851
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300851
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300851&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0300851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John M. Tilford & Paula K. Roberson & Debra H. Fiser, 1996. "Using lfit and lroc to evaluate mortality prediction models," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LLC, vol. 5(28).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Romo Valenzuela & Nikhil L Chervu & Yvonne Roca & Yas Sanaiha & Saad Mallick & Peyman Benharash, 2024. "Socioeconomic disparities in risk of financial toxicity following elective cardiac operations in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.