IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0300727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can biased search results change people’s opinions about anything at all? a close replication of the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME)

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Epstein
  • Ji Li

Abstract

In previous experiments we have conducted on the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME), we have focused on the ability of biased search results to shift voting preferences. In three new experiments with a total of 1,137 US residents (mean age = 33.2), we sought to determine whether biased search rankings could shift people’s opinions on topics that do not involve candidates or elections. Each of the new experiments looked at a different topic, and participants were pre-screened to make sure they didn’t have strong opinions about these topics. The topics were: Is artificial intelligence useful or dangerous? Is fracking helpful or dangerous? And: Are people born gay or do they choose to be gay? All participants were first asked various demographic questions, then shown brief summaries of the “pro” and “anti” views on each topic, and then asked their opinions about each topic. Next, participants were allowed to conduct an online search using our mock search engine (Kadoodle) lasting up to 15 minutes. In each experiment, one-third of the participants saw biased search results favoring one perspective; one-third saw biased search results favoring the opposing perspective; and one-third (the control group) saw mixed search results. After completing their search, participants were again asked for their opinions about the topic. Our primary dependent variable was Manipulation Power (MP), the percentage increase in the number of participants favoring one viewpoint after having viewed search rankings favoring that viewpoint. The MPs in the three experiments were 25.0%, 30.9%, and 17.8%, respectively. Corresponding shifts were also found for how persuasive participants found each viewpoint to be and for how much they trusted each viewpoint. We conclude that search rankings favoring one viewpoint on a wide range of topics might be able to cause people who have not yet formulated a strong opinion on such topics to adopt the favored perspective. If our findings prove to be robust, we are exposing what might be considered an unforeseen consequence of the creation of search engines, namely that even without human interference, search algorithms will inevitably alter the thinking and behavior of billions of people worldwide on perhaps any topic for which they have not yet formed strong opinions.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Epstein & Ji Li, 2024. "Can biased search results change people’s opinions about anything at all? a close replication of the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300727
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300727
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300727&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0300727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Haas & Julian Unkel, 2017. "Ranking versus reputation: perception and effects of search result credibility," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(12), pages 1285-1298, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Epstein & Vivian Lee & Roger Mohr & Vanessa R Zankich, 2022. "The Answer Bot Effect (ABE): A powerful new form of influence made possible by intelligent personal assistants and search engines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Robert Epstein & Christina Tyagi & Hongyu Wang, 2023. "What would happen if twitter sent consequential messages to only a strategically important subset of users? A quantification of the Targeted Messaging Effect (TME)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Cláudia Lessa & Arnaldo Coelho, 2024. "Building Trust in Higher Education Institutions: Using Congruence to Overcome Scepticism and Increase Credibility, Reputation, and Student Employability Through CSR," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 18-32, February.
    4. Georg Pardi & Steffen Gottschling & Yvonne Kammerer, 2024. "The influence of knowledge type and source reputation on preferences for website or video search results," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(5), pages 521-537, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.