IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0300646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining diaries and accelerometers to explain change in physical activity during a lifestyle intervention for adults with pre-diabetes: A PREVIEW sub-study

Author

Listed:
  • Leon Klos
  • Gareth Stratton
  • Kelly A Mackintosh
  • Melitta A McNarry
  • Mikael Fogelholm
  • Mathijs Drummen
  • Ian Macdonald
  • J Alfredo Martinez
  • Santiago Navas-Carretero
  • Teodora Handjieva-Darlenska
  • Georgi Bogdanov
  • Nicholas Gant
  • Sally D Poppitt
  • Marta P Silvestre
  • Jennie Brand-Miller
  • Roslyn Muirhead
  • Wolfgang Schlicht
  • Maija Huttunen-Lenz
  • Shannon Brodie
  • Elli Jalo
  • Margriet Westerterp-Plantenga
  • Tanja Adam
  • Pia Siig Vestentoft
  • Heikki Tikkanen
  • Jonas S Quist
  • Anne Raben
  • Nils Swindell

Abstract

Self-report and device-based measures of physical activity (PA) both have unique strengths and limitations; combining these measures should provide complementary and comprehensive insights to PA behaviours. Therefore, we aim to 1) identify PA clusters and clusters of change in PA based on self-reported daily activities and 2) assess differences in device-based PA between clusters in a lifestyle intervention, the PREVIEW diabetes prevention study. In total, 232 participants with overweight and prediabetes (147 women; 55.9 ± 9.5yrs; BMI ≥25 kg·m-2; impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance) were clustered using a partitioning around medoids algorithm based on self-reported daily activities before a lifestyle intervention and their changes after 6 and 12 months. Device-assessed PA levels (PAL), sedentary time (SED), light PA (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) were assessed using ActiSleep+ accelerometers and compared between clusters using (multivariate) analyses of covariance. At baseline, the self-reported “walking and housework” cluster had significantly higher PAL, MVPA and LPA, and less SED than the “inactive” cluster. LPA was higher only among the “cycling” cluster. There was no difference in the device-based measures between the “social-sports” and “inactive” clusters. Looking at the changes after 6 months, the “increased walking” cluster showed the greatest increase in PAL while the “increased cycling” cluster accumulated the highest amount of LPA. The “increased housework” and “increased supervised sports” reported least favourable changes in device-based PA. After 12 months, there was only minor change in activities between the “increased walking and cycling”, “no change” and “increased supervised sports” clusters, with no significant differences in device-based measures. Combining self-report and device-based measures provides better insights into the behaviours that change during an intervention. Walking and cycling may be suitable activities to increase PA in adults with prediabetes.

Suggested Citation

  • Leon Klos & Gareth Stratton & Kelly A Mackintosh & Melitta A McNarry & Mikael Fogelholm & Mathijs Drummen & Ian Macdonald & J Alfredo Martinez & Santiago Navas-Carretero & Teodora Handjieva-Darlenska , 2024. "Combining diaries and accelerometers to explain change in physical activity during a lifestyle intervention for adults with pre-diabetes: A PREVIEW sub-study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300646
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300646
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300646&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0300646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.