IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0298743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting successful draft outcome in Australian Rules football: Model sensitivity is superior in neural networks when compared to logistic regression

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Jennings
  • Jay C Perrett
  • Daniel W Wundersitz
  • Courtney J Sullivan
  • Stephen D Cousins
  • Michael I Kingsley

Abstract

Using logistic regression and neural networks, the aim of this study was to compare model performance when predicting player draft outcome during the 2021 AFL National Draft. Physical testing, in-game movement and technical involvements were collected from 708 elite-junior Australian Rules football players during consecutive seasons. Predictive models were generated using data from 465 players (2017 to 2020). Data from 243 players were then used to prospectively predict the 2021 AFL National Draft. Logistic regression and neural network models were compared for specificity, sensitivity and accuracy using relative cut-off thresholds from 5% to 50%. Using factored and unfactored data, and a range of relative cut-off thresholds, neural networks accounted for 73% of the 40 best performing models across positional groups and data configurations. Neural networks correctly classified more drafted players than logistic regression in 88% of cases at draft rate (15%) and convergence threshold (35%). Using individual variables across thresholds, neural networks (specificity = 79 ± 13%, sensitivity = 61 ± 24%, accuracy = 76 ± 8%) were consistently superior to logistic regression (specificity = 73 ± 15%, sensitivity = 29 ± 14%, accuracy = 66 ± 11%). Where the goal is to identify talented players with draft potential, model sensitivity is paramount, and neural networks were superior to logistic regression.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Jennings & Jay C Perrett & Daniel W Wundersitz & Courtney J Sullivan & Stephen D Cousins & Michael I Kingsley, 2024. "Predicting successful draft outcome in Australian Rules football: Model sensitivity is superior in neural networks when compared to logistic regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298743
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298743
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298743&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0298743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0175716 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Paul Larkin & Daryl Marchant & Amy Syder & Damian Farrow, 2020. "An eye for talent: The recruiters’ role in the Australian Football talent pathway," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.