IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0298275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Awareness regarding breast cancer amongst women in Pakistan: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Abdul Rehman
  • Erfa Tahir
  • Huzaifa Ghulam Hussain
  • Ayesha Khalid
  • Syed Mohammad Taqi
  • Eilaf Ahmed Meenai

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BCa) is the most common cause of cancer death in Pakistan. In 2019, Pakistan saw the highest global BCa-associated death rate. But do Pakistani women know about the various aspects of BCa? And how prevalent are BCa screening methods amongst Pakistani females? These questions formed the basis for our study. Methods: We conducted this review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. On September 1, 2023, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, and performed a citation search to search for eligible studies published in 2010 or after, using the following terms: “breast cancer” and “Pakistan”. Observational studies that evaluated BCa awareness and/or practice amongst Pakistani females who were not associated with medicine were eligible. We used the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool to assess the risk of bias. We conducted a proportion meta-analysis to calculate pooled prevalences for variables. Results: Responses from 9766 Pakistani women across 18 included studies showed alarmingly low levels of BCa knowledge: risk factors, 42.7% (95% CI: 34.1%-51.4%); symptoms, 41.8% (95% CI: 26.2%-57.5%); diagnostic modalities, 36.3% (95% CI: 23.1%-49.4%); treatments, 46.6% (95% CI: 13.5%-79.8%). Prevalence of breast self-examination (BSE) and ever having undergone a clinical breast exam (CBE) was 28.7% (95% CI: 17.9%-39.6%) and 15.3% (95 CI: 11.2%-19.4%), respectively. BCa knowledge was significantly associated with better educational status, age, and socioeconomic status. Conclusion: On average, only two in five Pakistani women are aware of one or more risk factors, symptoms, or diagnostic modalities. Approximately one in two women know about possible BCa treatment. Less than one in three women practice regular BSE, and less than one in five women have ever undergone a CBE.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Abdul Rehman & Erfa Tahir & Huzaifa Ghulam Hussain & Ayesha Khalid & Syed Mohammad Taqi & Eilaf Ahmed Meenai, 2024. "Awareness regarding breast cancer amongst women in Pakistan: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298275
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298275&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0298275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samina Rafique & Zainab Waseem & Fatima Sheerin, 2018. "Breast Cancer Awareness, Attitude and Screening Practices Among University Students- Intervention Needed," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 4(5), pages 4107-4110, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ki-Hoon Jun, 2019. "Some Social Implications Drawn from Recent Publications in the BJSTR, by Researchers' Origin Countries," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 14(5), pages 10936-10939, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.