IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0298154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The every woman study™ low- and middle-income countries edition protocol: A multi-country observational study to assess opportunities and challenges to improving survival and quality of life for women with ovarian cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Frances Reid
  • Tracey Adams
  • Rafe Sadnan Adel
  • Carlos E Andrade
  • Anmol Bajwa
  • Ian G Bambury
  • Nada Benhima
  • Raikhan Bolatbekova
  • David Cantu-De Leon
  • Phaedra Charlton
  • Carlos Chávez Chirinos
  • Robin Cohen
  • Mary Eiken
  • Erick Estuardo Estrada
  • Dilyara Kaidarova
  • Iren Lau
  • Clara MacKay
  • Precious Takondwa Makondi
  • Asima Mukhopadhyay
  • Aisha Mustapha
  • Florencia Noll
  • Martin Origa
  • Jitendra Pariyar
  • Shahana Pervin
  • Ngoc T H Phan
  • Basel Refky
  • Afrin F Shaffi
  • Eva-Maria Strömsholm
  • Yin Ling Woo
  • Sook-Yee Yoon
  • Nargiza Zakirova
  • Runcie C W Chidebe
  • Garth Funston
  • Isabelle Soerjomataram

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer is a challenging disease to diagnose and treat effectively with five-year survival rates below 50%. Previous patient experience research in high-income countries highlighted common challenges and opportunities to improve survival and quality of life for women affected by ovarian cancer. However, no comparable data exist for low-and middle-income countries, where 70% of women with the disease live. This study aims to address this evidence gap. Methods: This is an observational multi-country study set in low- and middle-income countries. We aim to recruit over 2000 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer across multiple hospitals in 24 countries in Asia, Africa and South America. Country sample sizes have been calculated (n = 70–96 participants /country), taking account of varying national five-year disease prevalence rates. Women within five years of their diagnosis, who are in contact with participating hospitals, are invited to take part in the study. A questionnaire has been adapted from a tool previously used in high-income countries. It comprises 57 multiple choice and two open-ended questions designed to collect information on demographics, women’s knowledge of ovarian cancer, route to diagnosis, access to treatments, surgery and genetic testing, support needs, the impact of the disease on women and their families, and their priorities for action. The questionnaire has been designed in English, translated into local languages and tested according to local ethics requirements. Questionnaires will be administered by a trained member of the clinical team. Conclusion: This study will inform further research, advocacy, and action in low- and middle-income countries based on tailored approaches to the national, regional and global challenges and opportunities. In addition, participating countries can choose to repeat the study to track progress and the protocol can be adapted for other countries and other diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Frances Reid & Tracey Adams & Rafe Sadnan Adel & Carlos E Andrade & Anmol Bajwa & Ian G Bambury & Nada Benhima & Raikhan Bolatbekova & David Cantu-De Leon & Phaedra Charlton & Carlos Chávez Chirinos &, 2024. "The every woman study™ low- and middle-income countries edition protocol: A multi-country observational study to assess opportunities and challenges to improving survival and quality of life for women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298154
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298154&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0298154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.