IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0298068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood cancer survivors: A cross-sectional retrospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Lucie Štrublová
  • Tomáš Kepák
  • Daniela Kuruczová
  • Filip Zlámal
  • Marta Holíková
  • Kateřina Kepáková
  • Jaroslav Štěrba
  • Julie Bienertová-Vašků

Abstract

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study examining the association between unemployment, cancer type, treatment and total body fat percentage of childhood cancer survivors recruited at St. Anne’s University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic. A total of 55 survivors aged 18–49 who were in remission of cancer and fulfilled the criteria for body composition measurements by the BIA and completed questionnaires investigating their socioeconomic status, employment status, and history. There was a significant relationship between the employment status and central nervous system-directed treatment (c2(1) = 7.53, p = 0.006, Cramér’s V = 0.38) and between the type of cancer and employment status (c2(3) = 7.83, p = 0.049, Cramér’s V = 0.38), the highest unemployment rate was recorded for brain and spine survivors (72.7%) compared to survivors with other diagnosis (35.7%) (uLR(1) = 4.91, p = 0.027; OR = 4.80, 95% CI:1.10–20.86, p = 0.036); these survivors did not have a significantly different body fat percentage compared to survivors with other diagnoses (t(53) = 1.29, p = 0.202, Cohen’s d = 0.41) Interestingly, the survivors reporting having a partner also had a significantly higher percentage of body fat (t(53) = 2.90, p = 0.005, Cohen’s d = 0.81). A linear regression model was used to model the percentage of body fat in relation to a set of selected variables and the we observed a significant effect of sex (female vs male: b = 6.37, 95% CI: 1.82–10.93, p = 0.007), partnership status (yes vs no: b = 5.65, 95% CI: 0.67–10.62, p = 0.027) and category of diagnosis (Brain and spinal column tumors vs Other solid tumors: b = 12.40, 95% CI: 0.59–24.21, p = 0.040; Brain and spinal column tumors vs Lymphoma: b = 14.02, 95% CI: 2.06–25.97, p = 0.023). Employment status and risk of adiposity in childhood cancer survivors depends on the type of treatment and diagnosis group, which may significantly impact their lifestyle and overall quality of life after treatment.Trial registration: This study was registered on July 29, 2022, at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05481229).

Suggested Citation

  • Lucie Štrublová & Tomáš Kepák & Daniela Kuruczová & Filip Zlámal & Marta Holíková & Kateřina Kepáková & Jaroslav Štěrba & Julie Bienertová-Vašků, 2024. "Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood cancer survivors: A cross-sectional retrospective study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298068
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298068
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298068&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0298068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0298068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.