IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0296968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trunk postural control during unstable sitting among individuals with and without low back pain: A systematic review with an individual participant data meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mansour Abdullah Alshehri
  • Hosam Alzahrani
  • Wolbert van den Hoorn
  • David M Klyne
  • Albert H Vette
  • Brad D Hendershot
  • Brad W R Roberts
  • Christian Larivière
  • David Barbado
  • Francisco J Vera-Garcia
  • Jaap H van Dieen
  • Jacek Cholewicki
  • Maury A Nussbaum
  • Michael L Madigan
  • Norman Peter Reeves
  • Sheri P Silfies
  • Stephen H M Brown
  • Paul W Hodges

Abstract

Introduction: Sitting on an unstable surface is a common paradigm to investigate trunk postural control among individuals with low back pain (LBP), by minimizing the influence lower extremities on balance control. Outcomes of many small studies are inconsistent (e.g., some find differences between groups while others do not), potentially due to confounding factors such as age, sex, body mass index [BMI], or clinical presentations. We conducted a systematic review with an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis to investigate whether trunk postural control differs between those with and without LBP, and whether the difference between groups is impacted by vision and potential confounding factors. Methods: We completed this review according to PRISMA-IPD guidelines. The literature was screened (up to 7th September 2023) from five electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Outcome measures were extracted that describe unstable seat movements, specifically centre of pressure or seat angle. Our main analyses included: 1) a two-stage IPD meta-analysis to assess the difference between groups and their interaction with age, sex, BMI, and vision on trunk postural control; 2) and a two-stage IPD meta-regression to determine the effects of LBP clinical features (pain intensity, disability, pain catastrophizing, and fear-avoidance beliefs) on trunk postural control. Results: Forty studies (1,821 participants) were included for the descriptive analysis and 24 studies (1,050 participants) were included for the IPD analysis. IPD meta-analyses revealed three main findings: (a) trunk postural control was worse (higher root mean square displacement [RMSdispl], range, and long-term diffusion; lower mean power frequency) among individuals with than without LBP; (b) trunk postural control deteriorated more (higher RMSdispl, short- and long-term diffusion) among individuals with than without LBP when vision was removed; and (c) older age and higher BMI had greater adverse impacts on trunk postural control (higher short-term diffusion; longer time and distance coordinates of the critical point) among individuals with than without LBP. IPD meta-regressions indicated no associations between the limited LBP clinical features that could be considered and trunk postural control. Conclusion: Trunk postural control appears to be inferior among individuals with LBP, which was indicated by increased seat movements and some evidence of trunk stiffening. These findings are likely explained by delayed or less accurate corrective responses. Systematic review registration: This review has been registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021124658).

Suggested Citation

  • Mansour Abdullah Alshehri & Hosam Alzahrani & Wolbert van den Hoorn & David M Klyne & Albert H Vette & Brad D Hendershot & Brad W R Roberts & Christian Larivière & David Barbado & Francisco J Vera-Gar, 2024. "Trunk postural control during unstable sitting among individuals with and without low back pain: A systematic review with an individual participant data meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-42, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296968
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296968
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296968&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0296968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mansour Abdullah Alshehri & Wolbert van den Hoorn & David M Klyne & Paul W Hodges, 2022. "Postural control of the trunk in individuals with and without low back pain during unstable sitting: A protocol for a systematic review with an individual participant data meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Vasileios Korakakis & Kieran O’Sullivan & Argyro Kotsifaki & Yiannis Sotiralis & Giannis Giakas, 2021. "Lumbo-pelvic proprioception in sitting is impaired in subgroups of low back pain–But the clinical utility of the differences is unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.