IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0296633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptuo-affective organization of touched materials in younger and older adults

Author

Listed:
  • Knut Drewing

Abstract

In everyday interaction we touch different materials, which we experience along a limited number of perceptual and emotional dimensions: For instances, a furry surface feels soft and pleasant, whereas sandpaper feels rough and unpleasant. In a previous study, younger adults manually explored a representative set of solid, fluid and granular materials. Their ratings were made along six perceptual dimensions (roughness, fluidity, granularity, deformability, fibrousness, heaviness) and three emotional ones (valence, arousal, dominance). Perceptual and emotional dimensions were systematically correlated. Here, we wondered how this perceptuo-affective organization of touched materials depends on age, given that older adults show decline in haptic abilities, in particular detail perception. 30 younger participants (~22 years, half females) and 15 older participants (~66 years) explored 25 materials using 18 perceptual and 9 emotional adjectives. We extracted 6 perceptual and 2 emotional dimensions. Older and younger adults showed similar dimensions. However, in younger participants roughness and granularity judgments were done separately, while they were collapsed in a single dimension in older people. Further, age groups differed in the perception of roughness, granularity and valence, and older people did not show a positive correlation between valence and granularity as did younger people. As expected, control analyses between young males and females did not reveal similar gender differences. Overall, the results demonstrate that older people organize and experience materials partly differently from younger people, which we lead back to sensory decline. However, other aspects of perceptual organization that also include fine perception are preserved into older age.

Suggested Citation

  • Knut Drewing, 2024. "Perceptuo-affective organization of touched materials in younger and older adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296633
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296633
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296633&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0296633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth A. Kensinger, 2008. "Age Differences in Memory for Arousing and Nonarousing Emotional Words," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(1), pages 13-18.
    2. Anne Klöcker & Michael Wiertlewski & Vincent Théate & Vincent Hayward & Jean-Louis Thonnard, 2013. "Physical Factors Influencing Pleasant Touch during Tactile Exploration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-8, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Klöcker & Calogero Maria Oddo & Domenico Camboni & Massimo Penta & Jean-Louis Thonnard, 2014. "Physical Factors Influencing Pleasant Touch during Passive Fingertip Stimulation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Donald G. MacKay & Laura W. Johnson & Elizabeth R. Graham & Deborah M. Burke, 2015. "Aging, Emotion, Attention, and Binding in the Taboo Stroop Task: Data and Theories," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-31, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.