IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0296616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prognostic biomarkers of intracerebral hemorrhage identified using targeted proteomics and machine learning algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Shubham Misra
  • Yuki Kawamura
  • Praveen Singh
  • Shantanu Sengupta
  • Manabesh Nath
  • Zuhaibur Rahman
  • Pradeep Kumar
  • Amit Kumar
  • Praveen Aggarwal
  • Achal K Srivastava
  • Awadh K Pandit
  • Dheeraj Mohania
  • Kameshwar Prasad
  • Nishant K Mishra
  • Deepti Vibha

Abstract

Early prognostication of patient outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is critical for patient care. We aim to investigate protein biomarkers’ role in prognosticating outcomes in ICH patients. We assessed 22 protein biomarkers using targeted proteomics in serum samples obtained from the ICH patient dataset (N = 150). We defined poor outcomes as modified Rankin scale score of 3–6. We incorporated clinical variables and protein biomarkers in regression models and random forest-based machine learning algorithms to predict poor outcomes and mortality. We report Odds Ratio (OR) or Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI). We used five-fold cross-validation and bootstrapping for internal validation of prediction models. We included 149 patients for 90-day and 144 patients with ICH for 180-day outcome analyses. In multivariable logistic regression, UCH-L1 (adjusted OR 9.23; 95%CI 2.41–35.33), alpha-2-macroglobulin (aOR 5.57; 95%CI 1.26–24.59), and Serpin-A11 (aOR 9.33; 95%CI 1.09–79.94) were independent predictors of 90-day poor outcome; MMP-2 (aOR 6.32; 95%CI 1.82–21.90) was independent predictor of 180-day poor outcome. In multivariable Cox regression models, IGFBP-3 (aHR 2.08; 95%CI 1.24–3.48) predicted 90-day and MMP-9 (aOR 1.98; 95%CI 1.19–3.32) predicted 180-day mortality. Machine learning identified additional predictors, including haptoglobin for poor outcomes and UCH-L1, APO-C1, and MMP-2 for mortality prediction. Overall, random forest models outperformed regression models for predicting 180-day poor outcomes (AUC 0.89), and 90-day (AUC 0.81) and 180-day mortality (AUC 0.81). Serum biomarkers independently predicted short-term poor outcomes and mortality after ICH. Further research utilizing a multi-omics platform and temporal profiling is needed to explore additional biomarkers and refine predictive models for ICH prognosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Shubham Misra & Yuki Kawamura & Praveen Singh & Shantanu Sengupta & Manabesh Nath & Zuhaibur Rahman & Pradeep Kumar & Amit Kumar & Praveen Aggarwal & Achal K Srivastava & Awadh K Pandit & Dheeraj Moha, 2024. "Prognostic biomarkers of intracerebral hemorrhage identified using targeted proteomics and machine learning algorithms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296616
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296616
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296616&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0296616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.