IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0296246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Deepshikha Chatterjee
  • Ana T Nogueira
  • Inge Wefes
  • Roger Chalkley
  • Susi Sturzenegger Varvayanis
  • Cynthia N Fuhrmann
  • Janani Varadarajan
  • Gabrielle A Jacob
  • Christiann H Gaines
  • Nisan M Hubbard
  • Sunita Chaudhary
  • Rebekah L Layton

Abstract

This study examines the intersectional role of citizenship and gender with career self-efficacy amongst 10,803 doctoral and postdoctoral trainees in US universities. These biomedical trainees completed surveys administered by 17 US institutions that participated in the National Institutes of Health Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (NIH BEST) Programs. Findings indicate that career self-efficacy of non-citizen trainees is significantly lower than that of US citizen trainees. While lower career efficacy was observed in women compared with men, it was even lower for non-citizen female trainees. Results suggest that specific career interests may be related to career self-efficacy. Relative to US citizen trainees, both male and female non-citizen trainees showed higher interest in pursuing a career as an academic research investigator. In comparison with non-citizen female trainees and citizen trainees of all genders, non-citizen male trainees expressed the highest interest in research-intensive (and especially principal investigator) careers. The authors discuss potential causes for these results and offer recommendations for increasing trainee career self-efficacy which can be incorporated into graduate and postdoctoral training.

Suggested Citation

  • Deepshikha Chatterjee & Ana T Nogueira & Inge Wefes & Roger Chalkley & Susi Sturzenegger Varvayanis & Cynthia N Fuhrmann & Janani Varadarajan & Gabrielle A Jacob & Christiann H Gaines & Nisan M Hubbar, 2024. "Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296246
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296246
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296246&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0296246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.