IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0295430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The association between cardiopulmonary exercise testing and postoperative outcomes in patients with lung cancer undergoing lung resection surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nabeela Arbee-Kalidas
  • Hlamatsi Jacob Moutlana
  • Yoshan Moodley
  • Moses Mogakolodi Kebalepile
  • Palesa Motshabi Chakane

Abstract

Background: Exercise capacity should be determined in all patients undergoing lung resection for lung cancer surgery and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) remains the gold standard. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between preoperative CPET and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lung resection surgery for lung cancer through a review of the existing literature. Methods: A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from inception until December 2022. Studies investigating associations between preoperative CPET and postoperative outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A random effect model meta-analysis was performed. I2 > 40% indicated a high level of heterogeneity. Results: Thirty-seven studies were included with 6450 patients. Twenty-eight studies had low risk of bias. V˙O2 peak is the oxygen consumption at peak exercise and serves as a marker of cardiopulmonary fitness. Higher estimates of V˙O2 peak, measured and as a percentagege of predicted, showed significant associations with a lower risk of mortality [MD: 3.66, 95% CI: 0.88; 6.43 and MD: 16.49, 95% CI: 6.92; 26.07] and fewer complications [MD: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.12; 3.00 and MD: 9.82, 95% CI: 5.88; 13.76]. Using a previously defined cutoff value of > 15mL/kg/min for V˙O2 peak, showed evidence of decreased odds of mortality [OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28–0.81] and but not decreased odds of postoperative morbidity [OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64–1.00]. There was no relationship between V˙E/V˙CO2 slope, which depicts ventilatory efficiency, with mortality [MD: -9.60, 95% CI: -27.74; 8.54] however, patients without postoperative complications had a lower preoperative V˙E/V˙CO2 [MD: -2.36, 95% CI: -3.01; -1.71]. Exercise load and anaerobic threshold did not correlate with morbidity or mortality. There was significant heterogeneity between studies. Conclusions: Estimates of cardiopulmonary fitness as evidenced by higher V˙O2 peak, measured and as a percentage of predicted, were associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. A cutoff value of V˙O2 peak > 15mL/kg/min was consistent with improved survival but not with fewer complications. Ventilatory efficiency was associated with decreased postoperative morbidity but not with improved survival. The heterogeneity in literature could be remedied with large scale, prospective, blinded, standardised research to improve preoperative risk stratification in patients with lung cancer scheduled for lung resection surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Nabeela Arbee-Kalidas & Hlamatsi Jacob Moutlana & Yoshan Moodley & Moses Mogakolodi Kebalepile & Palesa Motshabi Chakane, 2023. "The association between cardiopulmonary exercise testing and postoperative outcomes in patients with lung cancer undergoing lung resection surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295430
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295430
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295430&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0295430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0226480 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.