IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0294215.html

Household costs, catastrophic out-of-pocket payments and impoverishment related to accessing surgical care in rural Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Yohannes Hailemichael
  • Tigist Eshetu
  • Sewit Timothewos
  • Andualem Deneke
  • Amezene Tadesse
  • Ahmed Abdella
  • Abebe Bekele
  • Andrew Leather
  • Girmay Medhin
  • Martin Prince
  • Charlotte Hanlon

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the household costs, catastrophic out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure, impoverishment and coping mechanisms used to pay for surgical care in a predominantly rural area of Ethiopia. Methods: We conducted a community-based, cross-sectional household survey of 182 people who had undergone a surgical procedure. Participants were interviewed in their homes at six weeks post-operation. Using a contextually adapted version of the Study of global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) questionnaire, we estimated direct and indirect costs of surgical care from a household perspective. Catastrophic out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure was estimated using thresholds of 10% and 25% of annual household consumption expenditure. Impacts of surgical care payments on poverty levels was estimated by comparing pre- and post-operative OOP payments. Analysis of variance, t-test and a logit model were used to assess factors associated with catastrophic OOP health expenditure. Results: Most surgical patients were women (87.9%), with 65.0% receiving obstetric surgical care. Direct costs dominated expenditure: direct average medical costs Birr 1649.5 (44.6%), direct average non-medical costs Birr 1226.5 (33.2%), indirect average costs Birr 821.9 (22.2%). Catastrophic OOP surgical care expenditure was experienced by 69.2% households at the 10% threshold and 45.6% at the 25% threshold. The increase in average normalized poverty gap due to OOP surgical care expenditure was higher in non-obstetric (14.1%) compared to obstetric (5.8%) procedures, and for non-emergency (13.3%) compared to emergency care (6.3%). To pay for surgical care, 38.0% of households had sold assets and 5.0% had borrowed money. Conclusions: Due to surgical care, households faced severe financial burdens leading to impoverishment. To mitigate the resulting financial constraints, households implemented hardship coping strategies. Provision of free obstetric surgical care reduced, but did not eliminate, these burdens. There is a pressing need to tailor financial risk protection mechanisms to achieve universal coverage for surgical care.

Suggested Citation

  • Yohannes Hailemichael & Tigist Eshetu & Sewit Timothewos & Andualem Deneke & Amezene Tadesse & Ahmed Abdella & Abebe Bekele & Andrew Leather & Girmay Medhin & Martin Prince & Charlotte Hanlon, 2026. "Household costs, catastrophic out-of-pocket payments and impoverishment related to accessing surgical care in rural Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294215
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294215
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294215&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0294215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.