IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0293879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An international consensus on effective, inclusive, and career-spanning short-format training in the life sciences and beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Jason J Williams
  • Rochelle E Tractenberg
  • Bérénice Batut
  • Erin A Becker
  • Anne M Brown
  • Melissa L Burke
  • Ben Busby
  • Nisha K Cooch
  • Allissa A Dillman
  • Samuel S Donovan
  • Maria A Doyle
  • Celia W G van Gelder
  • Christina R Hall
  • Kate L Hertweck
  • Kari L Jordan
  • John R Jungck
  • Ainsley R Latour
  • Jessica M Lindvall
  • Marta Lloret-Llinares
  • Gary S McDowell
  • Rana Morris
  • Teresa Mourad
  • Amy Nisselle
  • Patricia Ordóñez
  • Lisanna Paladin
  • Patricia M Palagi
  • Mahadeo A Sukhai
  • Tracy K Teal
  • Louise Woodley

Abstract

Science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) fields change rapidly and are increasingly interdisciplinary. Commonly, STEMM practitioners use short-format training (SFT) such as workshops and short courses for upskilling and reskilling, but unaddressed challenges limit SFT’s effectiveness and inclusiveness. Education researchers, students in SFT courses, and organizations have called for research and strategies that can strengthen SFT in terms of effectiveness, inclusiveness, and accessibility across multiple dimensions. This paper describes the project that resulted in a consensus set of 14 actionable recommendations to systematically strengthen SFT. A diverse international group of 30 experts in education, accessibility, and life sciences came together from 10 countries to develop recommendations that can help strengthen SFT globally. Participants, including representation from some of the largest life science training programs globally, assembled findings in the educational sciences and encompassed the experiences of several of the largest life science SFT programs. The 14 recommendations were derived through a Delphi method, where consensus was achieved in real time as the group completed a series of meetings and tasks designed to elicit specific recommendations. Recommendations cover the breadth of SFT contexts and stakeholder groups and include actions for instructors (e.g., make equity and inclusion an ethical obligation), programs (e.g., centralize infrastructure for assessment and evaluation), as well as organizations and funders (e.g., professionalize training SFT instructors; deploy SFT to counter inequity). Recommendations are aligned with a purpose-built framework—“The Bicycle Principles”—that prioritizes evidenced-based teaching, inclusiveness, and equity, as well as the ability to scale, share, and sustain SFT. We also describe how the Bicycle Principles and recommendations are consistent with educational change theories and can overcome systemic barriers to delivering consistently effective, inclusive, and career-spanning SFT.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason J Williams & Rochelle E Tractenberg & Bérénice Batut & Erin A Becker & Anne M Brown & Melissa L Burke & Ben Busby & Nisha K Cooch & Allissa A Dillman & Samuel S Donovan & Maria A Doyle & Celia W, 2023. "An international consensus on effective, inclusive, and career-spanning short-format training in the life sciences and beyond," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0293879
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293879
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293879&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0293879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0225256 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kim T Gurwitz & Prakash Singh Gaur & Louisa J Bellis & Lee Larcombe & Eva Alloza & Balint Laszlo Balint & Alexander Botzki & Jure Dimec & Victoria Dominguez del Angel & Pedro L Fernandes & Eija Korpel, 2020. "A framework to assess the quality and impact of bioinformatics training across ELIXIR," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corinne S. Martin & Susanna Repo & Juan Arenas Márquez & Niklas Blomberg & Katharina B. Lauer & Xènia Pérez Sitjà & Premysl Velek & Ana M. P. Melo & Christine Stansberg & Francesca De Leo & Elina Grin, 2021. "Demonstrating public value to funders and other stakeholders—the journey of ELIXIR, a virtual and distributed research infrastructure for life science data," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(3), pages 497-510, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0293879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.