Author
Listed:
- Ingrid Garcia De Sena
- Adalberto Veronese da Costa
- Isis Kelly dos Santos
- Dayane Pessoa de Araújo
- Francisca Tayná da Silva Gomes
- José Rodolfo Lopes de Paiva Cavalcanti
- Maria Irany Knackfuss
- Micássio Fernandes de Andrade
- Paloma Katlheen Moura Melo
- Ivana Alice Teixeira Fonseca
Abstract
Background: To determine the feasibility and effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in individuals with Parkinson’s and their effect on symptom modification and progression. Methods: We conducted this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). All studies were searched in seven databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Virtual Health Library (VHL) and SCOPUS in September 2020 and updated in June 2023. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. We used standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and random effects models, as well as the non-parametric Cochran’s Q test and I2 inconsistency test to assess heterogeneity. Results: A total of 15 randomized clinical trials with 654 participants (mean age, 65.4 years). The majority of studies included high intensity training interventions versus moderate intensity, usual care, or control group. The meta-analysis comparing high-intensity exercise versus control group showed an improvement in the disease severity (MD = -4.80 [95%CI, -6.38; -3.21 high evidence certainty); maximum oxygen consumption (MD = 1.81 [95%CI, 0.36; 3.27] very low evidence certainty) and quality of life (MD = -0.54 [95%CI, -0.94; -0.13] moderate evidence certainty). The results showed that high-intensity exercise compared with moderate intensity exercise group showed a improve motor function and functional mobility measured by the TUG test (MD = -0.38 [95%CI, -0.91; 0.16] moderate evidence certainty) with moderate heterogeneity between studies. Conclusion: High-intensity exercise performed in both continuous and interval modes when compared with control groups may provide motor function benefits for individuals with Parkinson’s disease. HIIT may be feasible, but the intensity of the exercise may influence individuals with Parkinson’s disease. However, there was a lack of evidence comparing high intensity and moderate intensity for this population, as the results showed heterogeneity.
Suggested Citation
Ingrid Garcia De Sena & Adalberto Veronese da Costa & Isis Kelly dos Santos & Dayane Pessoa de Araújo & Francisca Tayná da Silva Gomes & José Rodolfo Lopes de Paiva Cavalcanti & Maria Irany Knackfuss , 2023.
"Feasibility and effect of high-intensity training on the progression of motor symptoms in adult individuals with Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0293357
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293357
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0293357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.