IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0292961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the use of QDE-SVM for gene feature selection and cell type classification from scRNA-seq data

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Yee Lin Ng
  • Shing Chiang Tan
  • Chia Sui Ong

Abstract

Cell type identification is one of the fundamental tasks in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies. It is a key step to facilitate downstream interpretations such as differential expression, trajectory inference, etc. scRNA-seq data contains technical variations that could affect the interpretation of the cell types. Therefore, gene selection, also known as feature selection in data science, plays an important role in selecting informative genes for scRNA-seq cell type identification. Generally speaking, feature selection methods are categorized into filter-, wrapper-, and embedded-based approaches. From the existing literature, methods from filter- and embedded-based approaches are widely applied in scRNA-seq gene selection tasks. The wrapper-based method that gives promising results in other fields has yet been extensively utilized for selecting gene features from scRNA-seq data; in addition, most of the existing wrapper methods used in this field are clustering instead of classification-based. With a large number of annotated data available today, this study applied a classification-based approach as an alternative to the clustering-based wrapper method. In our work, a quantum-inspired differential evolution (QDE) wrapped with a classification method was introduced to select a subset of genes from twelve well-known scRNA-seq transcriptomic datasets to identify cell types. In particular, the QDE was combined with different machine-learning (ML) classifiers namely logistic regression, decision tree, support vector machine (SVM) with linear and radial basis function kernels, as well as extreme learning machine. The linear SVM wrapped with QDE, namely QDE-SVM, was chosen by referring to the feature selection results from the experiment. QDE-SVM showed a superior cell type classification performance among QDE wrapping with other ML classifiers as well as the recent wrapper methods (i.e., FSCAM, SSD-LAHC, MA-HS, and BSF). QDE-SVM achieved an average accuracy of 0.9559, while the other wrapper methods achieved average accuracies in the range of 0.8292 to 0.8872.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Yee Lin Ng & Shing Chiang Tan & Chia Sui Ong, 2023. "On the use of QDE-SVM for gene feature selection and cell type classification from scRNA-seq data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292961
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292961
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292961&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0292961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey M. Perkel, 2017. "Single-cell sequencing made simple," Nature, Nature, vol. 547(7661), pages 125-126, July.
    2. Grace X. Y. Zheng & Jessica M. Terry & Phillip Belgrader & Paul Ryvkin & Zachary W. Bent & Ryan Wilson & Solongo B. Ziraldo & Tobias D. Wheeler & Geoff P. McDermott & Junjie Zhu & Mark T. Gregory & Jo, 2017. "Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azka Javaid & Hildreth Robert Frost, 2023. "STREAK: A supervised cell surface receptor abundance estimation strategy for single cell RNA-sequencing data using feature selection and thresholded gene set scoring," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-24, August.
    2. repec:plo:pcbi00:1007925 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Snehalika Lall & Sumanta Ray & Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay, 2022. "A copula based topology preserving graph convolution network for clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Qunlun Shen & Shihua Zhang, 2021. "Approximate distance correlation for selecting highly interrelated genes across datasets," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Jinzhou Li & Marloes H. Maathuis, 2021. "GGM knockoff filter: False discovery rate control for Gaussian graphical models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(3), pages 534-558, July.
    6. Lin Lin & Wei Shi & Jianbo Ye & Jia Li, 2023. "Multisource single‐cell data integration by MAW barycenter for Gaussian mixture models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 866-877, June.
    7. Breanne Sparta & Timothy Hamilton & Gunalan Natesan & Samuel D Aragones & Eric J Deeds, 2024. "Binomial models uncover biological variation during feature selection of droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-31, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.