Author
Listed:
- Annalisa V Piccorelli
- Jerry A Nick
Abstract
Background: The duration of time a person with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) spends on the lung transplant waitlist is dependent on waitlist and post-transplant survival probabilities and can extend up to 2 years. Understanding the characteristics involved with lung transplant and survival prognoses may help guide decision making by the patient, the referring CF Center and the transplant team. Methods: This study seeks to identify clinical predictors of lung transplant and survival of individuals with CF using 29,847 subjects from 2003–2014 entered in the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR). Results: Predictors significant (p ≤ 0.05) in the final logistic regression model predicting probability of lung transplant/death were: FEV1 (% predicted), BMI, age of diagnosis, age, number of pulmonary exacerbations, race, sex, CF-related diabetes (CFRD), corticosteroid use, infections with B. cepacia, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, MRSA, pancreatic enzyme use, insurance status, and consecutive ibuprofen use for at least 4 years. The final Cox regression model predicting time to lung transplant identified these predictors as significant FEV1 (% predicted), BMI, age of diagnosis, age, number of pulmonary exacerbations, race, sex, CF-related diabetes (CFRD), corticosteroid use, infections with B. cepacia, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, MRSA, pancreatic enzyme use, and consecutive ibuprofen use for at least 4 years. The concordance indices were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusions: The models are translated into nomograms to simplify investigation of how various characteristics relate to lung transplant and survival prognosis individuals with CF not receiving highly effective CFTR modulator therapy.
Suggested Citation
Annalisa V Piccorelli & Jerry A Nick, 2024.
"Modeling cystic fibrosis patient prognosis: Nomograms to predict lung transplantation and survival prior to highly effective modular therapy,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0292568
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292568
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.