IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0292348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global and regional quality of care index (QCI) by gender and age in oesophageal cancer: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Shabnam Iezadi
  • Narges Ebrahimi
  • Seyyed-Hadi Ghamari
  • Zahra Esfahani
  • Negar Rezaei
  • Erfan Ghasemi
  • Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam
  • Sina Azadnajafabad
  • Zhaleh Abdi
  • Zahra Shokri Varniab
  • Ali Golestani
  • Ashkan Pourabhari Langroudi
  • Arezou Dilmaghani-Marand
  • Yosef Farzi
  • Hamid Pourasghari

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the quality of care by age and gender in oesophageal cancer using Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database. Methods: Patients aged 20 and over with oesophageal cancer were included in this longitudinal study using GBD 1990–2019 data. We used the Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) to classify the regions. We used Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method to calculate the Quality of Care Index (QCI). The QCI was rescaled into a 0–100 single index, demonstrating that the higher the score, the better the QC. Results: The age-standardized QCI for oesophageal cancer dramatically increased from 23.5 in 1990 to 41.1 in 2019 for both sexes, globally. The high SDI regions showed higher QCI than the rest of the regions (45.1 in 1990 and 65.7 in 2019) whereas the low SDI regions had the lowest QCI, which showed a 4.5% decrease through the years (from 13.3 in 1990 to 12.7 in 2019). Globally, in 2019, the QCI showed the highest scores for patients aged 80–84, reported 48.2, and the lowest score for patients aged 25–29 reported 31.5, for both sexes. Globally, in 2019, age-standardized Gender Disparity Ratio (GDR) was 1.2, showing higher QCI in females than males. Conclusion: There were fundamental differences in the QCI both globally and regionally between different age groups as well as between males and females. To achieve the goal of providing high-quality services equally to people in need in all over the world, health systems need to invest in effective diagnostic services, treatments, facilities, and equipment and to plan for screening and surveillance of high-risk individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Shabnam Iezadi & Narges Ebrahimi & Seyyed-Hadi Ghamari & Zahra Esfahani & Negar Rezaei & Erfan Ghasemi & Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam & Sina Azadnajafabad & Zhaleh Abdi & Zahra Shokri Varniab & Ali Golestan, 2023. "Global and regional quality of care index (QCI) by gender and age in oesophageal cancer: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2019," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292348
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292348
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292348&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0292348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.