IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0292303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calcium supplementation in pregnancy: An analysis of potential determinants in an under-resourced setting

Author

Listed:
  • Atem Bethel Ajong
  • Bruno Kenfack
  • Innocent Mbulli Ali
  • Martin Ndinakie Yakum
  • Prince Onydinma Ukaogo
  • Fulbert Nkwele Mangala
  • Loai Aljerf
  • Phelix Bruno Telefo

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the evidence that calcium supplementation in pregnancy improves maternofoetal outcomes, many women still do not take calcium supplements during pregnancy in Cameroon. This study identifies factors that influence calcium supplementation during pregnancy in a low resource setting. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional hospital-based study (from November 2020 to September 2021) targeting 1074 healthy women in late pregnancy at the maternities of four major health facilities in the Nkongsamba Health District, Cameroon. Data were collected using an interview-administered semi-structured questionnaire and analysed using Epi Info version 7.2.4.0, and the statistical threshold for significance set at p-value = 0.05. Results: The mean age of the participants was 28.20±6.08 years, with a range of 15–47 years. The proportion of women who reported taking any calcium supplements in pregnancy was 72.62 [69.85–75.22]%. Only 12% of calcium-supplemented women took calcium supplements throughout pregnancy, while a majority (50%) took calcium supplements just for 4–5 months. Women believe that taking calcium supplements is more for foetal growth and development (37.12%) and prevention of cramps (38.86%), than for the prevention of hypertensive diseases in pregnancy (2.84%). About all pregnant women (97.65%) took iron and folic acid supplements during pregnancy, and 99.24% took these supplements at least once every two days. Upon control for multiple confounders, the onset of antenatal care before 4 months of pregnancy (AOR = 2.64 [1.84–3.78], p-value = 0.000), having had more than 3 antenatal care visits (AOR = 6.01 [3.84–9.34], p-value = 0.000) and support/reminder from a partner on the necessity to take supplements in pregnancy (AOR = 2.00 [1.34–2.99], p-value = 0.001) were significantly associated with higher odds of taking any calcium supplements in pregnancy. Conclusion: Calcium supplementation practices in pregnancy remain poor in this population and far from WHO recommendations. Early initiation of antenatal care, a high number of antenatal visits and reminders or support from the partner on supplement intake significantly increase the odds of taking any calcium supplements in pregnancy. In line with WHO recommendations, women of childbearing age should be sensitised to initiate antenatal care earlier and attain as many visits as possible. Male involvement in prenatal care might also boost the likelihood of these women taking calcium supplements.

Suggested Citation

  • Atem Bethel Ajong & Bruno Kenfack & Innocent Mbulli Ali & Martin Ndinakie Yakum & Prince Onydinma Ukaogo & Fulbert Nkwele Mangala & Loai Aljerf & Phelix Bruno Telefo, 2023. "Calcium supplementation in pregnancy: An analysis of potential determinants in an under-resourced setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292303
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292303
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292303&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0292303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.