IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0291875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural congenital anomalies in resource limited setting, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yohannes Fikadu Geda
  • Yirgalem Yosef Lamiso
  • Tamirat Melis Berhe
  • Seid Jemal Mohammed
  • Samuel Ejeta Chibsa
  • Tadesse Sahle Adeba
  • Kenzudin Assfa Mossa
  • Seblework Abeje
  • Molalegn Mesele Gesese

Abstract

Background: A number of studies have looked at neonatal structural birth defects. However, there is no study with a comprehensive review of structural anomalies. Therefor we aimed to verify the best available articles to pool possible risk factors of structural congenital anomalies in resource limited settings. Setting: Genuine search of the research articles was done via PubMed, Scopes, Cochrane library, the Web of Science; free Google database search engines, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases. Published and unpublished articles were searched and screened for inclusion in the final analysis and Studies without sound methodologies, and review and meta-analysis were not included in this analysis. Participants: This review analyzed data from 95,755 women who have birthed from as reported by primary studies. Ten articles were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles which have no full information important for the analysis and case reports were excluded from the study. Results: The overall pooled effect estimate of structural congenital anomalies was 5.50 [4.88–6.12]. In this systematic review and meta-analysis maternal illness effect estimate (EI) with odds ratio (OR) = 4.93 (95%CI 1.02–8.85), unidentified drug use OR = 2.83 (95%CI 1.19–4.46), birth weight OR = 4.20 (95%CI 2.12–6.28), chewing chat OR = 3.73 (95%CI 1.20–6.30), chemical exposure OR = 4.27 (95%CI 1.19–8.44) and taking folic acid tablet during pregnancy OR = 6.01 (95%CI 2.87–14.89) were statistically significant in this meta-regression. Conclusions: The overall pooled effect estimate of structural congenital anomalies in a resource limited setting was high compared to better resource countries. On the Meta-regression maternal illness, unidentified drug use, birth weight, chewing chat, chemical exposure and never using folic acid were found to be statistically significant variables Preconception care and adequate intake of folic acid before and during early pregnancy should be advised.

Suggested Citation

  • Yohannes Fikadu Geda & Yirgalem Yosef Lamiso & Tamirat Melis Berhe & Seid Jemal Mohammed & Samuel Ejeta Chibsa & Tadesse Sahle Adeba & Kenzudin Assfa Mossa & Seblework Abeje & Molalegn Mesele Gesese, 2023. "Structural congenital anomalies in resource limited setting, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291875
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291875
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291875&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0291875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.