IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0291664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Needs assessment study of postgraduate surgical education in Sudan: Trainees perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Elrasheid A H Kheirelseid
  • Reem Magzoub
  • Muhannad Ahmed
  • Abdulrahman A Rudwan
  • Mohamed S M Awoda
  • Walter Cullen

Abstract

Introduction: Global interest has increased in improving the quality and increasing the number of graduates from surgical training programmes in countries with limited resources. Needs assessment of stakeholders in the training programmes represent the backbone of such process. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical training in Sudan from trainees’ perspective in order to inform training delivery. Methods: We adopted mixed methods design using focus group discussion for qualitative data collection and questionnaire survey for quantitative data. NVivo 20 Pro was used to organize qualitative data and SPSS 24.0 was used for quantitative data analysis. Results: Thematic analysis of qualitative data identified three themes. Trainees were overall satisfied that they will make good surgeons after completion of the programme. They identified case volume and collaborations with colleagues as the main strengths of the programme and lacking clear objectives for each year of training and academic activities as the main weaknesses. They suggested motivation of trainers and utilization of online resources and meeting platforms as solutions to improve supervision and academic activities during training. Conclusion: The gaps in training and their suggested solutions highlighted by trainees in this study should form the base for reforming the surgical training in Sudan and countries with similar circumstances.

Suggested Citation

  • Elrasheid A H Kheirelseid & Reem Magzoub & Muhannad Ahmed & Abdulrahman A Rudwan & Mohamed S M Awoda & Walter Cullen, 2023. "Needs assessment study of postgraduate surgical education in Sudan: Trainees perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291664
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291664
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291664&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0291664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.