Author
Listed:
- Paridhi Jha
- Vikas Kumar Jha
- Bharati Sharma
- Ajeya Jha
- Kerstin Erlandsson
- Malin Bogren
Abstract
Background: Women’s birthing experience is a sensitive indicator of the quality of childbirth care and can impact the physical and mental health of both women and their neonates. Negligible evidence exists on Indian women’s birth experiences and–to the best of authors’ knowledge–no questionnaire has been tested in India for measuring women’s birthing experiences. This study aimed to test the construct validity and reliability of the Kannada-translated Revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among postnatal women (n = 251, up to six months postpartum, with a live healthy neonate) who had given birth at a public or private health facility using the Kannada-translated CEQ2 in two districts of Karnataka. Data were collected at participants’ homes after seeking written informed consent. Model fit was determined by Confirmatory Factor Analyses. Results: The 4-factor model of the CEQ2 showed good fit after deletion of one item (item 8, subcategory “participation”) with CMIN = 1.33; SRMR = 0.04; GFI = 0.92, CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.037 and p value 0.002). The Cronbach alpha values were acceptable for the four subscales (0.92, 0.93, 0.97, 0.91) as well as for the overall 21-item scale (0.84). Conclusions: The Kannada-translated CEQ2 is a reliable tool to measure the childbirth experiences among Kannada-speaking women and can serve as a reliable ongoing evaluation of women’s birth experiences.
Suggested Citation
Paridhi Jha & Vikas Kumar Jha & Bharati Sharma & Ajeya Jha & Kerstin Erlandsson & Malin Bogren, 2023.
"Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 in Karnataka state, India,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0291591
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291591
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.