IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0291100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of modern contraceptive methods using patterns among later reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Md Shohel Rana
  • Shimlin Jahan Khanam
  • Md Badsha Alam
  • Md Tahir Hassen
  • Md Iqbal Kabir
  • Md Nuruzzaman Khan

Abstract

Background: With the rapid increase in the number of women in their later reproductive years (aged 35 and above) in the present decade, the concern surrounding their contraceptive considerations has reached a critical point of importance. This study aims to examine the trends and determinants of modern contraceptive uptake among later reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh. Methods: A total of 17,736 women aged 35 and above were included in the analysis, utilizing data from three consecutives Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 2011, 2014, and 2017–18. The outcome variable was the uptake of modern contraceptive methods (yes or no). The explanatory variables encompassed survey years, individual characteristics of the women, as well as characteristics of their partners and the community. Multilevel logistic regression model was used to explore the association of the outcome variable with explanatory variables. Results: We found that approximately 54% of women aged 35 and more do not use modern contraceptive methods, and there have been no significant shifts in their usage observed over the survey years. Compared to women aged 35–39, women aged 40–45 (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.49–0.57) and 45–49 (aOR = 0.24, 0.22–0.26) reported lower likelihoods of modern contraceptive method uptake. Higher education correlated with increased uptake of modern contraceptive methods (112%-142%), while partner’s education showed a negative association. Later reproductive-aged women in richer (aOR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74–0.94) and richest (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66–0.88) quintiles reported lower uptake of modern contraceptive methods compared to their counterparts in the poorest quintile. Later reproductive-aged women in Dhaka (aOR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07–1.38) and Rajshahi (aOR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.19–1.59) regions had higher uptake of modern contraception than those residing in the Barishal division. Modern contraceptive methods uptake was 1.22 times higher among women who reported exposure to mass media and 1.19 times higher among women who reported engagement in paid work compared to among women who reported no exposure to mass media and participation in no formal work, respectively. Modern contraceptive methods uptake was 43% higher (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.32–1.55) in women with more than 2 children compared to those with ≤2 children. Conclusion: The study highlights no significant change in modern contraception uptake among later reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh. This raises concerns about the elevated risk of unintended pregnancies and shorter birth intervals, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to address the specific needs and preferences of this demographic.

Suggested Citation

  • Md Shohel Rana & Shimlin Jahan Khanam & Md Badsha Alam & Md Tahir Hassen & Md Iqbal Kabir & Md Nuruzzaman Khan, 2024. "Exploration of modern contraceptive methods using patterns among later reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291100
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291100&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0291100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Nuruzzaman Khan & Pushpendra Kumar & Md. Mijanur Rahman & Md. Nazrul Islam Mondal & M. Mofizul Islam, 2020. "Inequalities in Utilization of Maternal Reproductive Health Care Services in Urban Bangladesh: A Population-Based Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, March.
    2. Md Nuruzzaman Khan & Melissa L. Harris & Desalegn Markos Shifti & Alexander Suuk Laar & Deborah Loxton, 2019. "Effects of unintended pregnancy on maternal healthcare services utilization in low- and lower-middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(5), pages 743-754, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md Nuruzzaman Khan & Melissa L Harris & Deborah Loxton, 2020. "Assessing the effect of pregnancy intention at conception on the continuum of care in maternal healthcare services use in Bangladesh: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Laísa Rodrigues Moreira & Fernanda Ewerling & Iná S. Santos & Fernando César Wehrmeister & Alicia Matijasevich & Aluisio J. D. Barros & Ana M. B. Menezes & Helen Gonçalves & Joseph Murray & Marlos R. , 2020. "Trends and inequalities in unplanned pregnancy in three population-based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(9), pages 1635-1645, December.
    3. Md Ruhul Kabir, 2021. "Adopting Andersen’s behavior model to identify factors influencing maternal healthcare service utilization in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Biplab Biswas & Nishith Kumar & Md Matiur Rahaman & Sukanta Das & Md Aminul Hoque, 2024. "Socioeconomic inequality and urban-rural disparity of antenatal care visits in Bangladesh: A trend and decomposition analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Aneela Sultana & Mahwish Zeeshan & Sohima Anzak, 2022. "A Phenomenological Analysis of Rural Women’s Childbirth Preferences," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    6. Saverio Bellizzi & Giuseppe Pichierri & Catello M Panu Napodano & Paola Murgia & Susanna Padrini & Quique Bassat, 2021. "Place of birth for unintended pregnancies in six former Soviet Union countries," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1553-1560, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.