IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The lived experiences of UK physiotherapists involved in Cauda Equina Syndrome litigation. A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Gillian Yeowell
  • Rachel Leech
  • Susan Greenhalgh
  • Emma Willis
  • James Selfe

Abstract

Background: Cauda Equina Syndrome is a serious spinal pathology, which can have life changing physical and psychological consequences and is highly litigious. Litigation can have negative personal and professional effects on the healthcare professionals cited in a clinical negligence claim. There is an absence of research looking at the experience of the physiotherapist and as such, it is unknown the impact litigation is having on them. This study explored the lived experiences of UK physiotherapists in relation to Cauda Equina Syndrome litigation. Methods: A qualitative design, informed by Gadamerian hermeneutic phenomenology, using semi-structured interviews was used to explore participants’ lived experiences of litigation. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Findings were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis framework. Nvivo software was used to facilitate analysis. The study is reported in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative (COREQ) research. Results: 40 interviews took place online or over the phone, with physiotherapists and stakeholders. Four themes were found; ‘litigation effects’, ‘it feels personal’, ‘learning from litigation’ and ‘support and training’. Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate the lived experiences of litigation in UK physiotherapists. Involvement in clinical negligence affected physiotherapists’ physical and mental wellbeing and impacted their clinical practice. Most physiotherapists felt litigation was a personal attack on them and their ability to do their job. Physiotherapists highlighted perceptions of a ‘blame culture’ and perceived stigma associated with the claim, which often led to a lack of sharing and learning from litigation. Physiotherapists emphasised the need for emotional support for those going through a legal claim and that training was needed to understand the process of litigation and range of potential outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillian Yeowell & Rachel Leech & Susan Greenhalgh & Emma Willis & James Selfe, 2023. "The lived experiences of UK physiotherapists involved in Cauda Equina Syndrome litigation. A qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290882
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290882
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290882&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.