IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An experimental approach to training mood for resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Vasileios Mantas
  • Vasileia Kotoula
  • Charles Zheng
  • Dylan M Nielson
  • Argyris Stringaris

Abstract

According to influential theories about mood, exposure to environments characterized by specific patterns of punishments and rewards could shape mood response to future stimuli. This raises the intriguing possibility that mood could be trained by exposure to controlled environments. The aim of the present study is to investigate experimental settings that increase resilience of mood to negative stimuli. For this study, a new task was developed where participants register their mood when rewards are added or subtracted from their score. The study was conducted online, using Amazon MTurk, and a total of N = 1287 participants were recruited for all three sets of experiments. In an exploratory experiment, sixteen different experimental task environments which are characterized by different mood-reward relationships, were tested. We identified six task environments that produce the greatest improvements in mood resilience to negative stimuli, as measured by decreased sensitivity to loss. In a next step, we isolated the two most effective task environments, from the previous set of experiments, and we replicated our results and tested mood’s resilience to negative stimuli over time, in a novel sample. We found that the effects of the task environments on mood are detectable and remain significant after multiple task rounds (approximately two minutes) for an environment where good mood yielded maximum reward. These findings are a first step in our effort to better understand the mechanisms behind mood training and its potential clinical utility.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasileios Mantas & Vasileia Kotoula & Charles Zheng & Dylan M Nielson & Argyris Stringaris, 2023. "An experimental approach to training mood for resilience," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290881
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290881
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290881&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eran Eldar & Yael Niv, 2015. "Interaction between emotional state and learning underlies mood instability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filip Gesiarz & Jan-Emmanuel De Neve & Tali Sharot, 2020. "The motivational cost of inequality: Opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Nina Rouhani & Cooper D. Grossman & Jamie Feusner & Anita Tusche, 2025. "Eating disorder symptoms and emotional arousal modulate food biases during reward learning in females," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Rachit Dubey & Thomas L Griffiths & Peter Dayan, 2022. "The pursuit of happiness: A reinforcement learning perspective on habituation and comparisons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-32, August.
    4. Roey Schurr & Daniel Reznik & Hanna Hillman & Rahul Bhui & Samuel J. Gershman, 2024. "Dynamic computational phenotyping of human cognition," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(5), pages 917-931, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.