Author
Listed:
- Scott D Emerson
- Taylor McLinden
- Paul Sereda
- Viviane D Lima
- Robert S Hogg
- Katherine W Kooij
- Amanda M Yonkman
- Kate A Salters
- David Moore
- Junine Toy
- Jason Wong
- Theodora Consolacion
- Julio S G Montaner
- Rolando Barrios
Abstract
Introduction: Case-finding algorithms can be applied to administrative healthcare records to identify people with diseases, including people with HIV (PWH). When supplementing an existing registry of a low prevalence disease, near-perfect specificity helps minimize impacts of adding in algorithm-identified false positive cases. We evaluated the performance of algorithms applied to healthcare records to supplement an HIV registry in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Methods: We applied algorithms based on HIV-related diagnostic codes to healthcare practitioner and hospitalization records. We evaluated 28 algorithms in a validation sub-sample of 7,124 persons with positive HIV tests (2,817 with a prior negative test) from the STOP HIV/AIDS data linkage–a linkage of healthcare, clinical, and HIV test records for PWH in BC, resembling a disease registry (1996–2020). Algorithms were primarily assessed based on their specificity–derived from this validation sub-sample–and their impact on the estimate of the total number of PWH in BC as of 2020. Results: In the validation sub-sample, median age at positive HIV test was 37 years (Q1: 30, Q3: 46), 80.1% were men, and 48.9% resided in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority. For all algorithms, specificity exceeded 97% and sensitivity ranged from 81% to 95%. To supplement the HIV registry, we selected an algorithm with 99.89% (95% CI: 99.76% - 100.00%) specificity and 82.21% (95% CI: 81.26% - 83.16%) sensitivity, requiring five HIV-related healthcare practitioner encounters or two HIV-related hospitalizations within a 12-month window, or one hospitalization with HIV as the most responsible diagnosis. Upon adding PWH identified by this highly-specific algorithm to the registry, 8,774 PWH were present in BC as of March 2020, of whom 333 (3.8%) were algorithm-identified. Discussion: In the context of an existing low prevalence disease registry, the results of our validation study demonstrate the value of highly-specific case-finding algorithms applied to administrative healthcare records to enhance our ability to estimate the number of PWH living in BC.
Suggested Citation
Scott D Emerson & Taylor McLinden & Paul Sereda & Viviane D Lima & Robert S Hogg & Katherine W Kooij & Amanda M Yonkman & Kate A Salters & David Moore & Junine Toy & Jason Wong & Theodora Consolacion , 2023.
"Identification of people with low prevalence diseases in administrative healthcare records: A case study of HIV in British Columbia, Canada,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-19, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0290777
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290777
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Julianne Cassista & Julie Payne-Gagnon & Brigitte Martel & Marie-Pierre Gagnon, 2014.
"Applying Theory to Understand and Modify Nurse Intention to Adhere to Recommendations regarding the Use of Filter Needles: An Intervention Mapping Approach,"
Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-8, July.
- Wilbert B. van den Hout, 2003.
"The Area under an ROC Curve with Limited Information,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(2), pages 160-166, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.