IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage

Author

Listed:
  • Kristine Hopkins
  • Jennifer Yarger
  • Irene Rossetto
  • Audrey Sanchez
  • Elisa Brown
  • Sarah Elmes
  • Thaddeus Mantaro
  • Kari White
  • Cynthia C Harper

Abstract

Background: Young people’s ability to use their preferred contraceptive method is an indicator of reproductive autonomy and healthcare access. State policies can hinder or facilitate access to a preferred contraceptive method. Objective: This study compared use of preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California, states with contrasting health policy contexts that impact health insurance coverage and access to subsidized family planning services. Methods: We used baseline survey data from an ongoing cluster randomized controlled trial of sexually active students, assigned female at birth, ages 18–25, at 29 community colleges in Texas and California (N = 1,974). We described contraceptive preferences and use, as well as reasons for nonuse of a preferred method. We conducted multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression analyses for clustered data, and then calculated the predicted probability of using a preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California by insurance status. Results: More Texas participants were uninsured than Californians (30% vs. 8%, p

Suggested Citation

  • Kristine Hopkins & Jennifer Yarger & Irene Rossetto & Audrey Sanchez & Elisa Brown & Sarah Elmes & Thaddeus Mantaro & Kari White & Cynthia C Harper, 2023. "Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290726
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290726
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290726&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.