IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of sanitization protocols in removing or reducing parasites from vegetables: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cláudio Márcio de Medeiros Maia
  • Karla Suzanne Florentino da Silva Chaves Damasceno
  • Larissa Mont’Alverne Jucá Seabra
  • Gabriela Chaves
  • Lívia Maria da Costa Dantas
  • Francisco Canindé de Sousa Júnior
  • Cristiane Fernandes de Assis

Abstract

Background: Parasitic contamination in vegetables is a reality in several countries and a challenge for food safety. The risk of consumption usually raw, associated with failures in good practices of production, transportation, and preparation further increase the possibility of ingesting contaminated food. Given this, a systematic review was carried out to scientifically demonstrate the effectiveness of sanitization protocols in the parasitic decontamination of plants. Methods: This review was conducted following the guidelines of the Cochrane Manual, being registered in the PROSPERO protocol base (CRD42020206929) and reported according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. The review evaluated studies published in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, FSTA, LILACS, and AGRIS databases, as well as manual searches of related articles, references, and theses and dissertations directories. The meta-analysis was performed using the Revman 5 software program, the bias assessment used the Robins I Tools with some adaptations, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Discussion: The review included a total of 31 studies, most of which were carried out in countries with a high incidence of plant parasites, such as Brazil and Iran. Interventions combined with 200ppm chlorination preceded by brushing, rinsing, or immersion in detergent showed the greatest efficiency in parasitic decontamination. Despite the high heterogeneity and risk of bias in the primary studies, this review can inspire the planning of new studies which observe the critical and methodological evaluation for research in the field of food safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Cláudio Márcio de Medeiros Maia & Karla Suzanne Florentino da Silva Chaves Damasceno & Larissa Mont’Alverne Jucá Seabra & Gabriela Chaves & Lívia Maria da Costa Dantas & Francisco Canindé de Sousa Jún, 2023. "Effectiveness of sanitization protocols in removing or reducing parasites from vegetables: A systematic review with meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290447
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290447
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290447&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cláudio Márcio de Medeiros Maia & Karla Suzanne Florentino da Silva Chaves Damasceno & Larissa Mont’Alverne Jucá Seabra & Gabriela Chaves & Lívia Maria da Costa Dantas & Francisco Canindé de Sousa Jún, 2022. "Efficacy of sanitization protocols in removing parasites in vegetables: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.