IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing feedforward neural networks using independent component analysis on hidden units

Author

Listed:
  • Seiya Satoh
  • Kenta Yamagishi
  • Tatsuji Takahashi

Abstract

Neural networks are widely used for classification and regression tasks, but they do not always perform well, nor explicitly inform us of the rationale for their predictions. In this study we propose a novel method of comparing a pair of different feedforward neural networks, which draws on independent components obtained by independent component analysis (ICA) on the hidden layers of these networks. It can compare different feedforward neural networks even when they have different structures, as well as feedforward neural networks that learned partially different datasets, yielding insights into their functionality or performance. We evaluate the proposed method by conducting three experiments with feedforward neural networks that have one hidden layer, and verify whether a pair of feedforward neural networks can be compared by the proposed method when the numbers of hidden units in the layer are different, when the datasets are partially different, and when activation functions are different. The results show that similar independent components are extracted from two feedforward neural networks, even when the three circumstances above are different. Our experiments also reveal that mere comparison of weights or activations does not lead to identifying similar relationships. Through the extraction of independent components, the proposed method can assess whether the internal processing of one neural network resembles that of another. This approach has the potential to help understand the performance of neural networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Seiya Satoh & Kenta Yamagishi & Tatsuji Takahashi, 2023. "Comparing feedforward neural networks using independent component analysis on hidden units," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290435
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290435
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290435&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.