IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporal organization of stride-to-stride variations contradicts predictive models for sensorimotor control of footfalls during walking

Author

Listed:
  • Madhur Mangalam
  • Damian G Kelty-Stephen
  • Joel H Sommerfeld
  • Nick Stergiou
  • Aaron D Likens

Abstract

Walking exhibits stride-to-stride variations. Given ongoing perturbations, these variations critically support continuous adaptations between the goal-directed organism and its surroundings. Here, we report that stride-to-stride variations during self-paced overground walking show cascade-like intermittency—stride intervals become uneven because stride intervals of different sizes interact and do not simply balance each other. Moreover, even when synchronizing footfalls with visual cues with variable timing of presentation, asynchrony in the timings of the cue and footfall shows cascade-like intermittency. This evidence conflicts with theories about the sensorimotor control of walking, according to which internal predictive models correct asynchrony in the timings of the cue and footfall from one stride to the next on crossing thresholds leading to the risk of falling. Hence, models of the sensorimotor control of walking must account for stride-to-stride variations beyond the constraints of threshold-dependent predictive internal models.

Suggested Citation

  • Madhur Mangalam & Damian G Kelty-Stephen & Joel H Sommerfeld & Nick Stergiou & Aaron D Likens, 2023. "Temporal organization of stride-to-stride variations contradicts predictive models for sensorimotor control of footfalls during walking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-35, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290324
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290324
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290324&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290324?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.