IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron wave using machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Cogill
  • Shriram Nallamshetty
  • Natalie Fullenkamp
  • Kent Heberer
  • Julie Lynch
  • Kyung Min Lee
  • Mihaela Aslan
  • Mei-Chiung Shih
  • Jennifer S Lee

Abstract

The Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant continues to strain healthcare systems. Developing tools that facilitate the identification of patients at highest risk of adverse outcomes is a priority. The study objectives are to develop population-scale predictive models that: 1) identify predictors of adverse outcomes with Omicron surge SARS-CoV-2 infections, and 2) predict the impact of prioritized vaccination of high-risk groups for said outcome. We prepared a retrospective longitudinal observational study of a national cohort of 172,814 patients in the U.S. Veteran Health Administration who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from January 15 to August 15, 2022. We utilized sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and vaccination status, at time of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 to predict hospitalization, escalation of care (high-flow oxygen, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, dialysis, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), and death within 30 days. Machine learning models demonstrated that advanced age, high comorbidity burden, lower body mass index, unvaccinated status, and oral anticoagulant use were the important predictors of hospitalization and escalation of care. Similar factors predicted death. However, anticoagulant use did not predict mortality risk. The all-cause death model showed the highest discrimination (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.903, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.895, 0.911) followed by hospitalization (AUC = 0.822, CI: 0.818, 0.826), then escalation of care (AUC = 0.793, CI: 0.784, 0.805). Assuming a vaccine efficacy range of 70.8 to 78.7%, our simulations projected that targeted prevention in the highest risk group may have reduced 30-day hospitalization and death in more than 2 of 5 unvaccinated patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Cogill & Shriram Nallamshetty & Natalie Fullenkamp & Kent Heberer & Julie Lynch & Kyung Min Lee & Mihaela Aslan & Mei-Chiung Shih & Jennifer S Lee, 2024. "Predicting clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron wave using machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290221
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290221
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290221&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shanmukh Alle & Akshay Kanakan & Samreen Siddiqui & Akshit Garg & Akshaya Karthikeyan & Priyanka Mehta & Neha Mishra & Partha Chattopadhyay & Priti Devi & Swati Waghdhare & Akansha Tyagi & Bansidhar T, 2022. "COVID-19 Risk Stratification and Mortality Prediction in Hospitalized Indian Patients: Harnessing clinical data for public health benefits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Qingyu Zhao & Ehsan Adeli & Kilian M. Pohl, 2020. "Training confounder-free deep learning models for medical applications," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingquan Lin & Tianhao Li & Yifan Yang & Gregory Holste & Ying Ding & Sarah H. Tassel & Kyle Kovacs & George Shih & Zhangyang Wang & Zhiyong Lu & Fei Wang & Yifan Peng, 2023. "Improving model fairness in image-based computer-aided diagnosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Charlene H. Chu & Simon Donato-Woodger & Shehroz S. Khan & Rune Nyrup & Kathleen Leslie & Alexandra Lyn & Tianyu Shi & Andria Bianchi & Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi & Amanda Grenier, 2023. "Age-related bias and artificial intelligence: a scoping review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Shiyang Lyu & Oyelola Adegboye & Kiki Adhinugraha & Theophilus I. Emeto & David Taniar, 2023. "Unlocking Insights: Analysing COVID-19 Lockdown Policies and Mobility Data in Victoria, Australia, through a Data-Driven Machine Learning Approach," Data, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.