IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0289931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning models can predict subsequent publication of North American Spine Society (NASS) annual general meeting abstracts

Author

Listed:
  • Aazad Abbas
  • Olumide Olotu
  • Akeshdeep Bhatia
  • Denis Selimovic
  • Alireza Tajik
  • Jeremie Larouche
  • Henry Ahn
  • Albert Yee
  • Stephen Lewis
  • Joel Finkelstein
  • Jay Toor

Abstract

Background context: Academic meetings serve as an opportunity to present and discuss novel ideas. Previous studies have identified factors predictive of publication without generating predictive models. Machine learning (ML) presents a novel tool capable of generating these models. As such, the objective of this study was to use ML models to predict subsequent publication of abstracts presented at a major surgical conference. Study design/setting: Database study. Methods: All abstracts from the North American Spine Society (NASS) annual general meetings (AGM) from 2013–2015 were reviewed. The following information was extracted: number of authors, institution, location, conference category, subject category, study type, data collection methodology, human subject research, and FDA approval. Abstracts were then searched on the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases for publication. ML models were trained to predict whether the abstract would be published or not. Quality of models was determined by using the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC). The top ten most important factors were extracted from the most successful model during testing. Results: A total of 1119 abstracts were presented, with 553 (49%) abstracts published. During training, the model with the highest AUC and accuracy metrics was the partial least squares (AUC of 0.77±0.05, accuracy of 75.5%±4.7%). During testing, the model with the highest AUC and accuracy was the random forest (AUC of 0.69, accuracy of 67%). The top ten features for the random forest model were (descending order): number of authors, year, conference category, subject category, human subjects research, continent, and data collection methodology. Conclusions: This was the first study attempting to use ML to predict the publication of complete articles after abstract presentation at a major academic conference. Future studies should incorporate deep learning frameworks, cognitive/results-based variables and aim to apply this methodology to larger conferences across other fields of medicine to improve the quality of works presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Aazad Abbas & Olumide Olotu & Akeshdeep Bhatia & Denis Selimovic & Alireza Tajik & Jeremie Larouche & Henry Ahn & Albert Yee & Stephen Lewis & Joel Finkelstein & Jay Toor, 2023. "Machine learning models can predict subsequent publication of North American Spine Society (NASS) annual general meeting abstracts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289931
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289931
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289931&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0289931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.