IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0289808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep learning classification of shoulder fractures on plain radiographs of the humerus, scapula and clavicle

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Magnéli
  • Petter Ling
  • Jacob Gislén
  • Johan Fagrell
  • Yilmaz Demir
  • Erica Domeij Arverud
  • Kristofer Hallberg
  • Björn Salomonsson
  • Max Gordon

Abstract

In this study, we present a deep learning model for fracture classification on shoulder radiographs using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The primary aim was to evaluate the classification performance of the CNN for proximal humeral fractures (PHF) based on the AO/OTA classification system. Secondary objectives included evaluating the model’s performance for diaphyseal humerus, clavicle, and scapula fractures. The training dataset consisted of 6,172 examinations, including 2–7 radiographs per examination. The overall area under the curve (AUC) for fracture classification was 0.89, indicating good performance. For PHF classification, 12 out of 16 classes achieved an AUC of 0.90 or greater. Additionally, the CNN model had excellent overall AUC for diaphyseal humerus fractures (0.97), clavicle fractures (0.96), and good AUC for scapula fractures (0.87). Despite the limitations of the study, such as the reliance on ground truth labels provided by students with limited radiographic assessment experience, our findings are in concordance with previous studies, further consolidating CNN as potent fracture classifiers in plain radiographs. The inclusion of multiple radiographs with different views from each examination, as well as the generally unselected nature of the sample, contributed to the overall generalizability of the study. This is the fifth study published by our group on AI in orthopaedic radiographs, which has consistently shown promising results. The next challenge for the orthopaedic research community will be to transfer these results from the research setting into clinical practice. External validation of the CNN model should be conducted in the future before it is considered for use in a clinical setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Magnéli & Petter Ling & Jacob Gislén & Johan Fagrell & Yilmaz Demir & Erica Domeij Arverud & Kristofer Hallberg & Björn Salomonsson & Max Gordon, 2023. "Deep learning classification of shoulder fractures on plain radiographs of the humerus, scapula and clavicle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289808
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289808
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289808&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0289808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.