IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0289498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cauchy combination omnibus test for normality

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Meng
  • Zhenzhen Jiang

Abstract

Testing whether data are from a normal distribution is a traditional problem and is of great concern for data analyses. The normality is the premise of many statistical methods, such as t-test, Hotelling T2 test and ANOVA. There are numerous tests in the literature and the commonly used ones are Anderson-Darling test, Shapiro-Wilk test and Jarque-Bera test. Each test has its own advantageous points since they are developed for specific patterns and there is no method that consistently performs optimally in all situations. Since the data distribution of practical problems can be complex and diverse, we propose a Cauchy Combination Omnibus Test (CCOT) that is robust and valid in most data cases. We also give some theoretical results to analyze the good properties of CCOT. Two obvious advantages of CCOT are that not only does CCOT have a display expression for calculating statistical significance, but extensive simulation results show its robustness regardless of the shape of distribution the data comes from. Applications to South African Heart Disease and Neonatal Hearing Impairment data further illustrate its practicability.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Meng & Zhenzhen Jiang, 2023. "Cauchy combination omnibus test for normality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289498
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289498
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289498&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0289498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.