Author
Listed:
- Wubshet Debebe Negash
- Getachew Teshale Kefale
- Tadele Biresaw Belachew
- Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw
Abstract
Background: Women’s decision-making autonomy has a potential impact on the scale-up of health care utilization. In high fertility countries, evidence regarding women’s decision-making autonomy on their health care utilization and its associated factors is limited and inconclusive. Hence, it is important to investigate women decision-making autonomy on their health care utilization and associated factors in high fertility countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: The data source for this study was obtained from recent Demographic and Health Surveys that were comprised of a weighted sample of 178875 reproductive age women. A multilevel mixed-effect binary logistic regression model was fitted. The odds ratios, along with the 95% confidence interval were generated to identify individual and community-level factors associated with women’s autonomy in health care decision-making. A p-value less than 0.05 was declared as statistical significance. Results: In this study, 42% (95% CI: 41.7, 42.3) of women were able to exercise their reproductive autonomy. The highest (74.8%) and the lowest (19.74%) magnitude of women autonomy was found in Angola and Mali, respectively. In multilevel analysis; age of women 25–34 years, 35 and above (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.29, 1.39), and (AOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.75, 1.90), women’s primary and secondary educational level (AOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.31), and (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.32, 1.54), husband primary and secondary educational level (AOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.29), and (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.27), women who had work (AOR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.59, 1.74) female household heads (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.37, 1.51), media exposure (AOR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.18), health insurance coverage (AOR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.36), urban residence (AOR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.19), community education (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI: 2.07, 2.85) and low community poverty level (AOR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.49) were predictor variables. Conclusion and recommendation: Although every woman has the right to make her own health care decisions, this study showed that almost 58% of them had no role in making decisions about their health care utilization. Thus, each country Government should support women’s decision making autonomy regarding their healthcare utilization through mass media and extensive behavioral education.
Suggested Citation
Wubshet Debebe Negash & Getachew Teshale Kefale & Tadele Biresaw Belachew & Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw, 2023.
"Married women decision making autonomy on health care utilization in high fertility sub-Saharan African countries: A multilevel analysis of recent Demographic and Health Survey,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0288603
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288603
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.