IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0288404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergence of cochlear transcriptomics between reference‑based and reference‑free transcriptome analyses among Rhinolophus ferrumequinum populations

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoxiao Shi
  • Jun Li
  • Tong Liu
  • Hanbo Zhao
  • Haixia Leng
  • Keping Sun
  • Jiang Feng

Abstract

Differences in gene expression within tissues can lead to differences in tissue function. Understanding the transcriptome of a species helps elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic divergence. According to the presence or absence of a reference genome of for a studied species, transcriptome analyses can be divided into reference‑based and reference‑free methods, respectively. Presently, comparisons of complete transcriptome analysis results between those two methods are still rare. In this study, we compared the cochlear transcriptome analysis results of greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) from three lineages in China with different acoustic phenotypes using reference‑based and reference‑free methods to explore their differences in subsequent analysis. The results gained by reference-based results had lower false-positive rates and were more accurate because differentially expressed genes among the three populations obtained by this method had greater reliability and a higher annotation rate. Some phenotype-related enrichment terms, including those related to inorganic molecules and proton transmembrane channels, were also obtained only by the reference-based method. However, the reference‑based method might have the limitation of incomplete information acquisition. Thus, we believe that a combination of reference‑free and reference‑based methods is ideal for transcriptome analyses. The results of our study provided a reference for the selection of transcriptome analysis methods in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxiao Shi & Jun Li & Tong Liu & Hanbo Zhao & Haixia Leng & Keping Sun & Jiang Feng, 2023. "Divergence of cochlear transcriptomics between reference‑based and reference‑free transcriptome analyses among Rhinolophus ferrumequinum populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288404
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288404&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0288404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.