Author
Listed:
- Nofe Alganmi
- Heba Abusamra
Abstract
The next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology represents a significant advance in genomics and medical diagnosis. Nevertheless, the time it takes to perform sequencing, data analysis, and variant interpretation is a bottleneck in using next-generation sequencing in precision medicine. For accurate and efficient performance in clinical diagnostic lab practice, a consistent data analysis pipeline is necessary to avoid false variant calls and achieve optimum accuracy. This study aims to compare the performance of two NGS data analysis pipeline compartments, including short-read mapping (BWA-MEM and BWA-MEM2) and variant calling (GATK-HaplotypeCaller and DRAGEN-GATK). On Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) data, computational performance was assessed using several criteria, including mapping efficiency, variant calling performance, false positive calls rate, and time. We examined four gold-standard WES data sets: Ashkenazim father (NA24149), Ashkenazim mother (NA24143), Ashkenazim son (NA24385), and Asian son (NA25631). In addition, eighteen exome samples were analyzed based on different read counts, and coverage was used precisely in the run-time assessment. By using BWA-MEM 2 and Dragen-GATK, this study achieved faster and more accurate detection for SNVs and indels than the standard GATK Best Practices workflow. This systematic comparison will enable the bioinformatics community to develop a more efficient and faster solution for analyzing NGS data.
Suggested Citation
Nofe Alganmi & Heba Abusamra, 2023.
"Evaluation of an optimized germline exomes pipeline using BWA-MEM2 and Dragen-GATK tools,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-12, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0288371
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288371
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.