IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0288274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gaussian hierarchical latent Dirichlet allocation: Bringing polysemy back

Author

Listed:
  • Takahiro Yoshida
  • Ryohei Hisano
  • Takaaki Ohnishi

Abstract

Topic models are widely used to discover the latent representation of a set of documents. The two canonical models are latent Dirichlet allocation, and Gaussian latent Dirichlet allocation, where the former uses multinomial distributions over words, and the latter uses multivariate Gaussian distributions over pre-trained word embedding vectors as the latent topic representations, respectively. Compared with latent Dirichlet allocation, Gaussian latent Dirichlet allocation is limited in the sense that it does not capture the polysemy of a word such as “bank.” In this paper, we show that Gaussian latent Dirichlet allocation could recover the ability to capture polysemy by introducing a hierarchical structure in the set of topics that the model can use to represent a given document. Our Gaussian hierarchical latent Dirichlet allocation significantly improves polysemy detection compared with Gaussian-based models and provides more parsimonious topic representations compared with hierarchical latent Dirichlet allocation. Our extensive quantitative experiments show that our model also achieves better topic coherence and held-out document predictive accuracy over a wide range of corpus and word embedding vectors which significantly improves the capture of polysemy compared with GLDA and CGTM. Our model learns the underlying topic distribution and hierarchical structure among topics simultaneously, which can be further used to understand the correlation among topics. Moreover, the added flexibility of our model does not necessarily increase the time complexity compared with GLDA and CGTM, which makes our model a good competitor to GLDA.

Suggested Citation

  • Takahiro Yoshida & Ryohei Hisano & Takaaki Ohnishi, 2023. "Gaussian hierarchical latent Dirichlet allocation: Bringing polysemy back," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288274
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288274
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288274&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0288274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.