IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0287937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive survey and analysis of international drinking water regulations for inorganic chemicals with comparisons to the World Health Organization’s drinking-water guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Erika J Mitchell
  • Seth H Frisbie

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has published criteria for determining the quality of drinking water since 1958. Since 1984, these criteria were termed “guidelines” to emphasize that they are not national standards, but rather guidelines for nations to develop their own national standards, which may take into account local environmental, social, economic, and cultural conditions. When calculating guideline values (GVs), the WHO reviews the toxicological literature, calculates a health-based value (HBV), and determines whether the HBV should be adopted as a GV. The WHO also considers aesthetic aspects of drinking water quality, such as taste and the staining of plumbing fixtures, and additionally supplies aesthetic values (AVs) for certain drinking water contaminants. There is no central registry for national drinking water standards, so the degree of variation of national drinking water standards is not known. Methods: We examined standards, guidelines, and background documents for all inorganic contaminants published by the WHO from 1958–2022. We also searched for national drinking water standards for all independent countries. Results: We found the WHO currently has 16 GVs, six HBVs without GVs, and six AVs without HBVs or GVs for inorganic drinking water contaminants, excluding disinfection agents and their byproducts. More than half of the point of departure studies used to support these values were published in 2005 or earlier. Ninety-eight percent of the world’s population lives in jurisdictions with drinking water standards, and 14 countries directly link their national standards to the current WHO’s drinking water guidelines. Lack of transparency (standards available only through purchase) and typographical errors are common problems, especially for resource-limited countries. Conclusions: The WHO drinking water guidelines are crucially important for drinking water safety; they are used for guidance or as official standards throughout the world. It is crucial that they be based on the best available science.

Suggested Citation

  • Erika J Mitchell & Seth H Frisbie, 2023. "A comprehensive survey and analysis of international drinking water regulations for inorganic chemicals with comparisons to the World Health Organization’s drinking-water guidelines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-64, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287937
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287937
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287937&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0287937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2022. "Georgia Country Economic Memorandum," World Bank Publications - Reports 38130, The World Bank Group.
    2. World Bank, 2022. "Georgia Country Economic Memorandum," World Bank Publications - Reports 38375, The World Bank Group.
    3. World Bank, 2022. "Bulgaria Country Economic Memorandum," World Bank Publications - Reports 38566, The World Bank Group.
    4. World Bank, 2022. "Poland Country Economic Memorandum," World Bank Publications - Reports 38116, The World Bank Group.
    5. World Bank, 2022. "Gabon Country Economic Memorandum [Gabon - Mémorandum Économique du Pays : Vers une Croissance Durable plus Verte et plus Inclusive]," World Bank Publications - Reports 38369, The World Bank Group.
    6. World Bank, 2022. "Benin Country Economic Memorandum 2.0 (Vol. 3)," World Bank Publications - Reports 37174, The World Bank Group.
    7. World Bank, 2022. "Benin Country Economic Memorandum 2.0 (Vol. 2)," World Bank Publications - Reports 37171, The World Bank Group.
    8. World Bank, 2022. "Zimbabwe Country Economic Memorandum," World Bank Publications - Reports 38224, The World Bank Group.
    9. World Bank, 2022. "Benin Country Economic Memorandum 2.0 (Vol. 4)," World Bank Publications - Reports 37176, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.