IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0287884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Access, acceptability, and uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among global migrants: A rapid review

Author

Listed:
  • Higinio Fernández-Sánchez
  • Ziad Zahoui
  • Jennifer Jones
  • Emmanuel Akwasi Marfo

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a rapid review and determine the acceptability, access, and uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among global migrants. Materials and methods: A rapid review was conducted May 2022 capturing data collected from April 2020 to May 2022. Eight databases were searched: PubMed, Ovid Medline, EMBase, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, LILACS, and the Web of Science. The keywords “migrants” AND COVID-19” AND “vaccine” were matched with terms in MeSH. Peer-reviewed articles in English, French, Portuguese, or French were included if they focused on COVID-19 immunization acceptability, access, or uptake among global migrants. Two independent reviewers selected and extracted data. Extracted data was synthesized in a table of key characteristics and summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: The search returned 1,186 articles. Ten articles met inclusion criteria. All authors reported data on the acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine, two on access, and one on uptake. Eight articles used quantitative designs and two studies were qualitative. Overall, global migrants had low acceptability and uptake, and faced challenges in accessing the COVID-19 vaccine, including technological issues. Conclusions: This rapid review provides a global overview of the access, acceptability, and uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among global migrants. Recommendations for practice, policy, and future research to increase access, acceptability, and uptake of vaccinations are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Higinio Fernández-Sánchez & Ziad Zahoui & Jennifer Jones & Emmanuel Akwasi Marfo, 2023. "Access, acceptability, and uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among global migrants: A rapid review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287884
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287884
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287884&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0287884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.