IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0287335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The experience of being a caregiver of patients with digestive cancer, from patients and caregivers’ perception: A mixed study

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Grivel
  • Pierre Nizet
  • Manon Martin
  • Solange Pécout
  • Aurélie Lepeintre
  • Yann Touchefeu
  • Sonia Prot-Labarthe
  • Adrien Evin
  • Jean-François Huon

Abstract

Backgrounds: Caregivers are essential in the care of a patient with digestive cancer. Considering their experience and needs is crucial. Objectives: To explore the experience of caregivers of patients with digestive cancer and to compare the perspectives of patients and caregivers. Methods: A mixed-methods study with a cross-sectional prospective and a comprehensive qualitative dimension was performed in a medical oncology unit in a French tertiary hospital. Dyads made of patients with digestive cancer and their caregiver were recruited. The Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers (SCNS-PC) questionnaires were distributed to caregivers. The CRA was used to measure the caregiver burden and the SCNS-PC was used to identify the unmet supportive care needs of caregivers. Semi-structured interviews with the dyads were conducted. Qualitative interviews addressed various dimensions of the caregiver’s experience from each dyad’s member perspective. Results: Thirty-two caregivers completed the questionnaires. Responses showed high self-esteem, schedule burden, and a need for care and information services. Ten dyads participated in the interviews. Three themes emerged from the caregiver’s interviews: illness is an upheaval; loneliness and helplessness are experienced; caring is a natural role with positive outcomes. Four themes emerged from patient’s interviews: the caregiver naturally assumes the role and gets closer; he is the patient’s anchor; his life is disrupted; anxiety and guilt accompany the desire to protect him. In comparing patient and caregiver data, the main theme of disagreement was their relationship. Conclusions: Caregiver care does not appear to be optimal, particularly in terms of their need for information. Patients have a fairly good representation of their experience, but the caregivers’ opinion need to be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Grivel & Pierre Nizet & Manon Martin & Solange Pécout & Aurélie Lepeintre & Yann Touchefeu & Sonia Prot-Labarthe & Adrien Evin & Jean-François Huon, 2023. "The experience of being a caregiver of patients with digestive cancer, from patients and caregivers’ perception: A mixed study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287335
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287335
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287335&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0287335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pmed00:0040296 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.